Spirometry test values can be estimated from a single chest radiograph

Abstract

IntroductionPhysical measurements of expiratory flow volume and speed can be obtained using spirometry. These measurements have been used for the diagnosis and risk assessment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and play a crucial role in delivering early care. However, spirometry is not performed frequently in routine clinical practice, thereby hindering the early detection of pulmonary function impairment. Chest radiographs (CXRs), though acquired frequently, are not used to measure pulmonary functional information. This study aimed to evaluate whether spirometry parameters can be estimated accurately from single frontal CXR without image findings using deep learning.MethodsForced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and FEV1/FVC as spirometry measurements as well as the corresponding chest radiographs of 11,837 participants were used in this study. The data were randomly allocated to the training, validation, and evaluation datasets at an 8:1:1 ratio. A deep learning network was pretrained using ImageNet. The input and output information were CXRs and spirometry test values, respectively. The training and evaluation of the deep learning network were performed separately for each parameter. The mean absolute error rate (MAPE) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) were used as the evaluation indices.ResultsThe MAPEs between the spirometry measurements and AI estimates for FVC, FEV1 and FEV1/FVC were 7.59% (r = 0.910), 9.06% (r = 0.879) and 5.21% (r = 0.522), respectively. A strong positive correlation was observed between the measured and predicted indices of FVC and FEV1. The average accuracy of >90% was obtained in each estimation of spirometry indices. Bland–Altman analysis revealed good agreement between the estimated and measured values for FVC and FEV1.DiscussionFrontal CXRs contain information related to pulmonary function, and AI estimation performed using frontal CXRs without image findings could accurately estimate spirometry values. The network proposed for estimating pulmonary function in this study could serve as a recommendation for performing spirometry or as an alternative method, suggesting its utility.