2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spirulina cultivated under different light emitting diodes: Enhanced cell growth and phycocyanin production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
27
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
27
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Phycocyanin degradation by temperature (Antelo et al, 2008) and light (Jespersen et al, 2005) over time are potential causes of extraction efficiency loss that we considered minimal in our experiments because moss samples were always kept at cool temperature and in the dark during the extraction. Repeatability reported here are also similar to values reported in literature for pure culture (Kissoudi et al, 2018;Prates et al, 2018). Thus, our results show that the efficiency of cyanobacteria cell wall disruption is the principal factor that could affect the quality of phycocyanin measurements but that, overall, phycocyanin can be accurately and reliably quantified for large cyanobacterial cell density and moss mass ranges.…”
Section: Phycocyanin Extraction Methods Characterization and Validationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Phycocyanin degradation by temperature (Antelo et al, 2008) and light (Jespersen et al, 2005) over time are potential causes of extraction efficiency loss that we considered minimal in our experiments because moss samples were always kept at cool temperature and in the dark during the extraction. Repeatability reported here are also similar to values reported in literature for pure culture (Kissoudi et al, 2018;Prates et al, 2018). Thus, our results show that the efficiency of cyanobacteria cell wall disruption is the principal factor that could affect the quality of phycocyanin measurements but that, overall, phycocyanin can be accurately and reliably quantified for large cyanobacterial cell density and moss mass ranges.…”
Section: Phycocyanin Extraction Methods Characterization and Validationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In this study, all samples (cyanobacteria cultures and mosses) had phycocyanin concentration above those limits. Phycocyanin apparent recoveries in moss found in this study are close to the average apparent recovery reported in pure cultures (50-60%, Tavanandi et al, 2018) but optimized methods can reach 90-92% (Kissoudi et al, 2018;Prates et al, 2018;Tavanandi et al, 2018). Phycocyanin concentration measured in cyanobacteria cultures depends greatly on the extraction process (e.g., solvent, extraction time, cell wall disruption technique; Abalde et al, 1998;Reis et al, 1998).…”
Section: Phycocyanin Extraction Methods Characterization and Validationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The fatty acid ester found at the greatest percentage was C16:0 (40.60–45.75%), followed by C20:0, C18:2n6c and C18:1n9c. Prates et al [47] reported that palmitic acid was predominant in the fatty acid profile of S . platensis .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee, Erickson and Yang (1987), using urea as a source of nitrogen, observed that the greatest bioenergetic gains occurred in conditions of lower light intensity, while the opposite phenomenon occurred in conditions of higher light intensity. Other authors point to better results with the use of constant lighting in addition to the use of LED lamps, or in a set of fluorescent lamps (HO et al, 2018;PRATES et al, 2018). Despite providing a greater gain in growth, the continuous use of artificial lighting is expensive and may affect the economic viability of the activity (GOVINDJEE et al, 1979).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%