1980
DOI: 10.1155/s0161171280000099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spline solutions for nonlinear two point boundary value problems

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Necessary formulas are developed for obtaining cubic, quartic, quintic, and sextic spline solutions of nonlinear boundary value problems.These methods enable us to approximate the solution of the boundary value problems, as well as their successive derivatives smoothly. Numerical evidence is included to demonstrate the relative performance of these four techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 here It is noted from Table 2 that, for each of the three methods, || E || is reduced by the factor 2 p (approximately), where p is the order of the method, as h is successively halved. It is also noted that the novel sixth order method gives smaller error moduli than the corresponding methods outlined in Jain [12] and Usmani [6] where, for h =0.1, || E || =0.3E-04. Table 3 also contains, for m = 3 and 4, the values of ||E|| obtained by Usmani [6] using his second order cubic spline method, while Table 4 contains the values of ||E|| obtained using the fourth order methods of Usmani [6] based on quartic and quintic splines.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 2 here It is noted from Table 2 that, for each of the three methods, || E || is reduced by the factor 2 p (approximately), where p is the order of the method, as h is successively halved. It is also noted that the novel sixth order method gives smaller error moduli than the corresponding methods outlined in Jain [12] and Usmani [6] where, for h =0.1, || E || =0.3E-04. Table 3 also contains, for m = 3 and 4, the values of ||E|| obtained by Usmani [6] using his second order cubic spline method, while Table 4 contains the values of ||E|| obtained using the fourth order methods of Usmani [6] based on quartic and quintic splines.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…To test the effectiveness of the second, fourth and sixth order methods developed in the paper, each was tested on the following problems which were also used by Lal and Moffatt [10], Usmani [6,8,11] and Jain [12]. Table 2, together with the equivalent results of the sixth order method of Jain [12] which was based on Lobatto quadrature.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spline functions were applied by many authors to establish the accurate and efficient numerical schemes for the solution of boundary value problems [4]. An exploration of the literature on a number of polynomial and non-polynomial spline techniques to solve the second order BVPs can be comprehended as quadratic spline method [8,26,32,42,49], cubic spline method [2-3, 5, 9-12, 15, 20-23, 27-28, 30-34, 36-38, 40-41, 50], quartic spline method [6, 13-14, 29, 47], quintic spline method [7,16,43,48] and others [39,46]. Voluminous research work have been contributed to this field but we are mainly concerned on those papers which have implemented non-polynomial splines for the solution of second order BVPs with various types of boundary conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some relations which connect N -1 spline values with N -1 derivative values have been discovered for N = 4 and N = 6 ([6], [7]). The purpose of this note is to give the general form and the leading term of the truncation error for these new relations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%