2012
DOI: 10.1563/aaid-joi-d-10-00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splinting Osseointegrated Implants and Natural Teeth in Partially Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Abstract: Dental implants in partially edentulous patients are a predictable therapeutic option. In patients with reduced bone volume, tooth-to-implant connected prostheses have been described as a treatment option. In this systematic review, the incidence of biologic and technical complications and the long-term survival rates of tooth-implant supported fixed partial dentures (FPDs) are analyzed. In cases where a natural tooth is connected with an implant to support a FPD, a rigid connection should be preferred.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
13
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of the recent studies concluded that rigid connections are superior to nonrigid ones [33, 120, 121]. Also, even if slightly more bone resorption occurred when rigid connection is used the clinical advantage of rigid connection, that is, avoiding tooth intrusion, justifies using the rigid connections rather than the nonrigid ones [33, 113].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the recent studies concluded that rigid connections are superior to nonrigid ones [33, 120, 121]. Also, even if slightly more bone resorption occurred when rigid connection is used the clinical advantage of rigid connection, that is, avoiding tooth intrusion, justifies using the rigid connections rather than the nonrigid ones [33, 113].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3-10 Some authors have accepted TISP but with special conditions as rigid connectors 9,12,35 or proper mesiodistal implant angulation. 11 Special cases like the one presented here was not studied sufficiently and its pros and cons are still unknown; the mechanical aspects of this case are discussed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23456262728] Some authors accepted TISP but with special conditions as rigid connector[52930] or good mesiodistal implant angulation. [31] Special cases like the one this article is highlighting did not take enough studying, and its pros and cons are still unknown yet, the mechanical aspect of this case is discussed here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%