2001
DOI: 10.1007/pl00002402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split-Course Radiotherapy: Where Do We Stand?

Abstract: No clinically relevant difference between continuous and split-course radiotherapy could be found. This, of course, does not proof that there are indeed no differences but the data do not allow to draw clear-cut conclusions in favor of or against split-course radiotherapy due to methodological shortcomings of the studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, the split-course radiotherapy used in this study might have detrimental effect on local control; however, there was no significant difference between split course and continuous course in the review of randomized trials. 19 In conclusion, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after curative resection may achieve a long-term survival rate in patients with ampullary cancer, although the details of treatment given in our study were rather variable. Nodal ratio and histologic differentiation are independent prognostic factors for these patients, and can serve as useful stratification factors in future trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Lastly, the split-course radiotherapy used in this study might have detrimental effect on local control; however, there was no significant difference between split course and continuous course in the review of randomized trials. 19 In conclusion, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after curative resection may achieve a long-term survival rate in patients with ampullary cancer, although the details of treatment given in our study were rather variable. Nodal ratio and histologic differentiation are independent prognostic factors for these patients, and can serve as useful stratification factors in future trials.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This increased tumor burden may be one of the underlying causes. There are conflicting reports on impact of RT scheme on local control and survival, possibly biased by nature of patient cohort [ 23 25 ]. Thus, findings from current studied should be interpreted with caution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, split-course RT is rarely used nowadays. 28 Also, concurrent chemotherapy and CRT is nowadays the treatment of choice for good performance status patients with locally advanced NSCLC. 29 However, as many patients are not eligible for concomitant chemo-radiotherapy treatment, 30 sequential chemotherapy and accelerated RT seems a promising treatment option.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%