2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.03.24.534001
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

split-intein Gal4 provides intersectional genetic labeling that is fully repressible by Gal80

Abstract: The split-Gal4 system allows for intersectional genetic labeling of highly specific cell-types and tissues in Drosophila. However, the existing split-Gal4 system, unlike the standard Gal4 system, cannot be repressed by Gal80, and therefore cannot be controlled temporally. This lack of temporal control precludes split-Gal4 experiments in which a genetic manipulation must be restricted to specific timepoints. Here, we describe a new split-Gal4 system based on a self-excising split-intein, which drives transgene … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, temporal regulation via AGES allows combining with other UAS transgenes for experiments like complementation analysis. Although the current version of AGES is incompatible with the many Gal80-insensitive split-Gal4 lines ( 25 ), it can be used with new Gal80-sensitive split-Gal4 lines ( 70 ). In summary, both temporal methods are effective, and we hope this exploration of their differences will help researchers choose the one best suited to their needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, temporal regulation via AGES allows combining with other UAS transgenes for experiments like complementation analysis. Although the current version of AGES is incompatible with the many Gal80-insensitive split-Gal4 lines ( 25 ), it can be used with new Gal80-sensitive split-Gal4 lines ( 70 ). In summary, both temporal methods are effective, and we hope this exploration of their differences will help researchers choose the one best suited to their needs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%