2023
DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Split k-mer analysis compared to cgMLST and SNP-based core genome analysis for detecting transmission of vancomycin-resistant enterococci: results from routine outbreak analyses across different hospitals and hospitals networks in Berlin, Germany

Abstract: The increase of Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) in recent years has been partially attributed to the rise of specific clonal lineages, which have been identified throughout Germany. To date, there is no gold standard for the interpretation of genomic data for outbreak analyses. New genomic approaches such as split k-mer analysis (SKA) could support cluster attribution for routine outbreak investigation. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two samples from patients C and D were more closely related, whereas the sample from patient B was relatively less correlated with the other two samples in the sequencing of antibiotic resistance proteins. However, all three were close enough to be considered causative of the same outbreak in the WGS analysis (cutoff ≤ 7 to 10 core SNP differences) [ 21 ]. The cgSNP distanace between the 3 strains was: (SNP sites per total core genome sites) and the maximum number of cgSNPs was no more than 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two samples from patients C and D were more closely related, whereas the sample from patient B was relatively less correlated with the other two samples in the sequencing of antibiotic resistance proteins. However, all three were close enough to be considered causative of the same outbreak in the WGS analysis (cutoff ≤ 7 to 10 core SNP differences) [ 21 ]. The cgSNP distanace between the 3 strains was: (SNP sites per total core genome sites) and the maximum number of cgSNPs was no more than 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the three identified isolates belonged differently to several clusters or if the SNP difference was too significant compared to the time scale in which transmission could occur, it was regarded as individually acquired rather than transmission between patients. To screen for potential transmission caused by pathogen, we defined isolate pairs with ≤ 7 to 10 core SNP differences [ 21 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients with VREfm isolates that were assessed as genetically clustered with other VREfm isolates in the cohort and likely represented direct transmission were excluded. Genetic clustering was defined using an international standard SNP cut-off (7 SNPs) 69,70 using a split Kmer (k=15) analysis (SKA) (https://github.com/simonrharris/SKA) (v.1.0), a reference-free pairwise method that compares the entire genome (unlike traditional core-genome based comparisons). Medical records from patients were reviewed for comorbidity and antibiotic prescribing data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 P. aeruginosa isolates were considered part of a genetically related cluster if ≥2 isolates differed from one another by no more than 15 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) using split kmer analysis (ska). 4,12 Additional P. aeruginosa ST1203 genomes, including those of three representative outbreak isolates, were downloaded from the NCBI database on April 6, 2023 (Table S1). A phylogenetic tree was made using RAxML from a core genome alignment generated with snippy (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy).…”
Section: Isolate Collection and Wgs Real-time Wgs Surveillance From E...mentioning
confidence: 99%