Split-shift work in relation to stress, health and psychosocial work factors among bus drivers

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Shift work has been associated with poor health, sleep and fatigue problems and low satisfaction with working hours. However, one type of shift working, namely split shifts, have received little attention. OBJECTIVE: This study examined stress, health and psychosocial aspects of split-shift schedules among bus drivers in urban transport. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to drivers working more than 70% of full time which 235 drivers in total answered. RESULTS: In general, drivers working split-shift schedules (n = 146) did not differ from drivers not working such shifts (n = 83) as regards any of the outcome variables that were studied. However, when individual perceptions towards split-shift schedules were taken into account, a different picture appeared. Bus drivers who reported problems working split shifts (36%) reported poorer health, higher perceived stress, working hours interfering with social life, lower sleep quality, more persistent fatigue and lower general work satisfaction than those who did not view split shifts as a problem. Moreover, drivers who reported problems with split shifts also perceived lower possibilities to influence working hours, indicating lower work time control. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that split shifts were not associated with increased stress, poorer health and adverse psychosocial work factors for the entire study sample. However, the results showed that individual differences were important and approximately one third of the drivers reported problems with split shifts, which in turn was associated with stress, poor health and negative psychosocial work conditions. More research is needed to understand the individual and organizational determinants of tolerance to split shifts.

Work stress and health problems of professional drivers: a hazardous formula for their safety outcomes

“…Furthermore, work-related stress of professional drivers has been associated with other adverse outcomes such as burnout , cardio-metabolic disease (Cohen, Kessler & Gordon, 1995; Brosschot, Pieper & Thayer, 2005; Spruill, 2010; Apostolopoulos et al, 2016) and poor mental and physical self-reported health (Stoynev & Minkova, 1997; Chung & Wong, 2011; Chung & Wu, 2013; Ihlström, Kecklund & Anund, 2017). Regarding mid and long-term outcomes, work stress may also explain worse results in, for instance, job adjustment (Schjott, 2002), job satisfaction (De Croon et al, 2002), and perceived well-being (O’Neill & Davis, 2011).…”

Short time between shifts and risk of injury among Danish hospital workers: a register-based cohort study

“…Thus, the risk of injury in 1-5 hours between shifts may reflect more the effect of a long work day, instead of a quick return where employees can return to their home and rest. These unusual events of 1-5 hours between shifts could be due to on-call shifts or split shifts, where the work day is split into at least two work periods (41,42). The mechanisms linking quick returns to risk of injury are not yet determined.…”

Teacher Stress and Students’ School Well-being: the Case of Upper Secondary Schools in Stockholm

“…Work-related depressed mood can be understood as a state of mind resulting from not being able to resolve the stress experienced in the work situation, thus resulting in too much negative stress (e.g., Niedhammer, Malard, & Chastang, 2015). Previous studies indicate that there is a causal relationship between stress and stress-related complaints, such that a high load of stress can lead to various forms of fatigue and depressed mood (e.g., Åkerstedt et al, 2014;Ihlström, Kecklund, & Anund, 2017;Shahid, Shen, & Shapiro, 2010). Stress-related conditions can therefore be described as different expressions and varying degrees of negative experiences linked to the work situation.…”