2017
DOI: 10.4153/cjm-2016-021-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splitting, Bounding, and Almost Disjointness Can Be Quite Different

Abstract: Abstract. We prove the consistency ofwith ZFC, where each of these cardinal invariants assume arbitrary uncountable regular values.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, It seems natural to expect that similar 3D-systems of iterations can be helpful in providing models in which, for example, b, s, and a are pairwise distinct. There are three ZFC admissible constellations: s < b < a, b < s < a, and b < a < s. The consistency of s = ℵ 1 < b < a holds in Shelah's original template model [23], while the consistency of ℵ 1 < s < b < a has been obtained by the first and third author of the current paper using the iteration of nondefinable (i.e., not Suslin) posets along a Shelah template (see [12]). The consistency of b < s < a (assuming the existence of a supercompact cardinal) is due to D. Raghavan and S. Shelah [22], and has been recently announced at the Oberwolfach Set Theory Meeting, February 2017.…”
Section: Definition 23 (Judah and Shelahmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…For instance, It seems natural to expect that similar 3D-systems of iterations can be helpful in providing models in which, for example, b, s, and a are pairwise distinct. There are three ZFC admissible constellations: s < b < a, b < s < a, and b < a < s. The consistency of s = ℵ 1 < b < a holds in Shelah's original template model [23], while the consistency of ℵ 1 < s < b < a has been obtained by the first and third author of the current paper using the iteration of nondefinable (i.e., not Suslin) posets along a Shelah template (see [12]). The consistency of b < s < a (assuming the existence of a supercompact cardinal) is due to D. Raghavan and S. Shelah [22], and has been recently announced at the Oberwolfach Set Theory Meeting, February 2017.…”
Section: Definition 23 (Judah and Shelahmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The consistency of ω 1 < d < a and ω 1 < u < a was obtained by Shelah in [58] where he developed the technique of forcing along a template (see also [8] and [10]). In [24] Fischer and Mejía proved that it is consistent that ω 1 < s < b < a (see also [45] and [22]). Note that a positive solution to the question of Brendle and Raghavan would provide a positive solution to the problem of Roitman.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…It is also known that s is independent from each of b and a individually. Some constellations of all three are also known to be consistent (see, e.g., [7]). The constructions tend to be difficult.…”
Section: Let Us Writementioning
confidence: 99%