2004
DOI: 10.1007/s001860400346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splitting graphs when calculating Myerson value for pure overhead games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, a further simplification is introduced in Gómez et al (2004): as the Shapley value reflects the importance of a node in the routing process, we do not need to consider the whole P(N ), but only the elements that represent valid paths in which the node participates. In addition, ''augmented'' paths shall not be considered.…”
Section: On the Efficient Computation Of The Shapley Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, a further simplification is introduced in Gómez et al (2004): as the Shapley value reflects the importance of a node in the routing process, we do not need to consider the whole P(N ), but only the elements that represent valid paths in which the node participates. In addition, ''augmented'' paths shall not be considered.…”
Section: On the Efficient Computation Of The Shapley Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2001, Algaba-Bilbao-Borm-Lopez characterized the Myerson value for union stable structures [1]. In 2004, Gomez-Gonzalez-Manuel-Owen-Pozo-Tejada calculated the Myerson value of splitting graphs for pure overhead games [3]. In 2012, Kim-Hee introduced various concepts of betweenness and centrality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of centrality measures has therefore attracted attention in order to characterize the individual nodes in a network. [9][10][11][12][13][14] Biological networks follow characteristics of real world networks including resistance against random node failures. These characteristics are believed to be due to the scale-free properties of these networks, 1 which suggest that only a small number of nodes are highly connected, whereas a large number of nodes have fewer connections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%