“…Consider the non-adjacent elements 1 and 6 of M. Then, by Lemma 1.2, M 1,6 S, C 1,6 is the matroid with ground set S and circuit set C 1,6 . By contracting 1 in M 1,6 , we get a matroid M 1,6 /{1}, which is isomorphic to the matroid M * K 3,3 .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Raghunathan et al 6 extended the splitting operation from graphs to binary matroids as follows. Definition 1.1.…”
We obtain some results concerning the planarity and graphicness of the splitting matroids. Further, we explore the effect of splitting operation on the sum of two matroids.
“…Consider the non-adjacent elements 1 and 6 of M. Then, by Lemma 1.2, M 1,6 S, C 1,6 is the matroid with ground set S and circuit set C 1,6 . By contracting 1 in M 1,6 , we get a matroid M 1,6 /{1}, which is isomorphic to the matroid M * K 3,3 .…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Raghunathan et al 6 extended the splitting operation from graphs to binary matroids as follows. Definition 1.1.…”
We obtain some results concerning the planarity and graphicness of the splitting matroids. Further, we explore the effect of splitting operation on the sum of two matroids.
“…For matroid concepts and terminology, we refer to Oxley 2 . Raghunathan et al 3 generalized the splitting operation of graphs to binary matroids and characterized Eulerian matroids in terms of this operation. We characterize connected Eulerian graphic matroids.…”
Using a splitting operation and a splitting lemma for connected graphs, Fleischner characterized connected Eulerian graphs. In this paper, we obtain a splitting lemma for 2-connected graphs and characterize 2-connected Eulerian graphs. As a consequence, we characterize connected graphic Eulerian matroids.
“…In [2] Raghunathan, Shikare and Waphare generalized the splitting operation of graphs to binary matroids. Shikare, Azadi and Waphare [6,7] extended the notions of n-point splitting from graphs to binary matroids.…”
Section: Figure 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let M be a binary matroid on a set S and X be a subset of Se ∈ X. Suppose that A is a matrix over GF (2), that represents the matroid M. Let A e X be the matrix that is obtained by adjoining an extra row to A with this row being zero everywhere except, in the columns corresponding to the elements of X where it, takes the value 1 and then adjoining two columns a and γ to the resulting matrix such that the column a is zero everywhere except in the last row (new row) where it takes the value 1, and γ is a sum of two column vectors corresponding to a and e.…”
Section: Splitting Of a Binary Matroid With Respect To An Element Andmentioning
In this paper, we characterize the n-line splitting operation of graphs in terms of cycles of respective graphs and then extend this operation to binary matroids.In matroids, we call this operation as element-set splitting. For convenience, we call the resulting matroid, es-splitting matroid. We characterize circuits of es-splitting matroid. We also characterize the es-splitting matroid in terms of matrices.We also show that if M is a connected binary matroid then es-splitting matroid M e X is also connected.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.