2010
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9947-2010-05207-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splitting of gauge groups

Abstract: Abstract. Let G be a topological group and let P be a principal G-bundle over a based space B. We denote the gauge group of P by G(P ) and the based gauge group of P by G 0 (P ). Then the inclusion of the basepoint of B induces the exact sequence of topological groups 1 → G 0 (P ) → G(P ) → G → 1. We study the splitting of this exact sequence in the category of A n -spaces and A n -maps in connection with the triviality of the adjoint bundle of P and with the higher homotopy commutativity of G.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though the following proposition is partially proved in [KK10], we give another proof. Map(B n G, BG) → BG → BWA n (G, G; eq), the conditions (ii) and (iii) are equivalent.…”
Section: Application: a N -Types Of Gauge Groupsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though the following proposition is partially proved in [KK10], we give another proof. Map(B n G, BG) → BG → BWA n (G, G; eq), the conditions (ii) and (iii) are equivalent.…”
Section: Application: a N -Types Of Gauge Groupsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Recall that they are described by using projective spaces as follows. See [Saü95] for the proof of (i), [KK10] for (ii), and [HK11] for (iii) and (iv). Obviously, any Sugawara C n -space is a C k (n)-space for k ≤ n, and any C k (n)-space is a C(k, n − k)-space.…”
Section: Application: Higher Homotopy Commutativitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence φ is an isomorphism between modules of indecomposables, implying that φ is an isomorphism of unstable algebras. Thus the composite As in the proof of [KK,Theorem 1.2], the A n -triviality of (ad P α ) (p) implies that G (P α ) (p) and G (S d × G) (p) have the same A n -type. We show the converse under some conditions.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In [10,12,13,19] and study their properties [11], nothing has been done for their classifying spaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%