2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

spMC: an R-package for 3D lithological reconstructions based on spatial Markov chains

Abstract: Cite this article as: Luca Sartore, Paolo Fabbri and Carlo Gaetan, spMC: an Rpackage for 3D lithological reconstructions based on spatial Markov chains, Computers and Geosciences, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.06.001 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting galley proof before it is publishe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3‐D model is deemed better suited for risk analysis in the VAP. Such a model could include, for instance, the hydro‐stratigraphic units of VAP subsoil reconstructed using the transition probability‐based code spMC (Fabbri et al, 2020; Sartore et al, 2016). This code allows evaluating the impact of the random spatial variability of key parameters, including peat distributions or recharge rates at regional scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3‐D model is deemed better suited for risk analysis in the VAP. Such a model could include, for instance, the hydro‐stratigraphic units of VAP subsoil reconstructed using the transition probability‐based code spMC (Fabbri et al, 2020; Sartore et al, 2016). This code allows evaluating the impact of the random spatial variability of key parameters, including peat distributions or recharge rates at regional scales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first step simplifies the local complex heterogeneity of the available 13 stratigraphic logs into five lithologies: A = clay, G = gravel, L = silt, LS = silty sand and S = sand. All analyses are performed by the package spMC [44] implemented in R, which is a free software environment for statistical computing and graphics. Figure 3a shows the sediment distribution indicated in the subsoil G (0.34), S (0.28) and L (0.22) as more frequent than A (0.09) and LS (0.07).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this area, the subsoil is particularly heterogeneous, representing the passage between the high and the middle Venetian Plain. The analyses of the studied area are performed by exploiting a recent implementation of MCP approach available in the spMC package [44] for the R environment [45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Three-dimensional (3-D) transition probability models of spatial variability are readily developed from 1-D Markov chains along principal stratigraphic directions (Carle and Fogg, 1997). • Continuous-lag Markov chains have been found suitable for 3-D modeling of vertical and lateral spatial transitioning among geo-or hydro-facies (Carle 1996;Carle and Fogg, 1996;Carle and Fogg, 1997;Carle et al, 1998;Fogg et al, 1998;Zhang and Fogg, 2003;Proce et al, 2004;Ye and Khaleel, 2008;Engdahl et al, 2010a;Bianchi et al, 2011;Pozdniakov et al, 2012;Purkis et al, 2012;Bakshevskaia and Pozdniakov, 2016;Krage et al, 2016;Sartore et al, 2016;Zhu et al, 2016a;Meirovitz et al, 2017;Guo et al, 2019b).…”
Section: Transition Probability-based Indicator Geostatisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tsim-s will be made available by request as the open-source fortran code tsim has been distributed in the past. The development of the equations necessary for implementation of the tsim-s algorithm are included in this paper to fully document the methods and to facilitate coding of the tsim algorithms in higher-level languages such as R (Sartore, 2013;Sartore et al, 2016). As will be seen in the equations, the computational overhead for tsim-s is not signifcantly different from tsim because the only modifications are to the entries in the cokriging matrices and the parameters of the quenching objective function.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%