2002
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47847-7_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPMD OpenMP versus MPI on a IBM SMP for 3 Kernels of the NAS Benchmarks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…sharing, examples of SPMD-type implementations on systems with a shared memory model also exist [23,24,25].…”
Section: Single Program Multiple Data Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sharing, examples of SPMD-type implementations on systems with a shared memory model also exist [23,24,25].…”
Section: Single Program Multiple Data Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…sharing, examples of SPMD-type implementations on systems with a shared memory model also exist [23,24,25].…”
Section: Single Program Multiple Data Computationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other recent papers [17,18] conduct a comparison of OpenMP versus MPI on a specific architecture, the IBM SP3 NH2, for a set of NAS benchmark applications (FT, CG, MG). The authors show that an OpenMP-based parallelization strategy, that takes into account data locality issues, i.e., requires a higher MPI-like programming effort, yields best performance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%