2020
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8081198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spoilage of Chilled Fresh Meat Products during Storage: A Quantitative Analysis of Literature Data

Abstract: A literature search was performed on spoilage of fresh meat products by combining keyword query, text mining and expert elicitation. From the 258 collected studies, a quantitative analysis was first performed to identify the methods which are the most used to evaluate spoilage beside the preservation strategies suggested. In a second step focusing on a subset of 24 publications providing quantitative data on spoilage occurrence time, associations between spoilage occurrence time of meat products and specific s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 169 publications
(155 reference statements)
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has to be noted that, during storage, chicken liver samples presented substantial inter-batch variability with regards to the levels of the different microbial groups (i.e., lower microbial counts in the first compared to the second batch) at all storage temperatures and most of the sampling points (data not shown). This variability could be attributed to factors such as the intrinsic characteristics of the liver tissue and the hygienic practices during slaughter and handling which seem to affect the structure of the indigenous microbial community and its evolution during storage ( Huis In’t Veld, 1996 ; Nychas et al, 2008 ; Tougan et al, 2013 ; Luong et al, 2020 ; Odeyemi et al, 2020 ). As a result, microbiological spoilage on chicken liver (i.e., TVC > 7 log CFU/g; Nychas and Tassou, 1997 ; Mikš-Krajnik et al, 2016 ; Rouger et al, 2017b ) was attained at 192 and 72 h of storage at 0°C for the first and second batch, respectively, at 120 and 72 h at 4°C and at 68 and 32 h at 8°C (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has to be noted that, during storage, chicken liver samples presented substantial inter-batch variability with regards to the levels of the different microbial groups (i.e., lower microbial counts in the first compared to the second batch) at all storage temperatures and most of the sampling points (data not shown). This variability could be attributed to factors such as the intrinsic characteristics of the liver tissue and the hygienic practices during slaughter and handling which seem to affect the structure of the indigenous microbial community and its evolution during storage ( Huis In’t Veld, 1996 ; Nychas et al, 2008 ; Tougan et al, 2013 ; Luong et al, 2020 ; Odeyemi et al, 2020 ). As a result, microbiological spoilage on chicken liver (i.e., TVC > 7 log CFU/g; Nychas and Tassou, 1997 ; Mikš-Krajnik et al, 2016 ; Rouger et al, 2017b ) was attained at 192 and 72 h of storage at 0°C for the first and second batch, respectively, at 120 and 72 h at 4°C and at 68 and 32 h at 8°C (data not shown).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…carnosus , and Lc. carnosum in refrigerated fresh and cured meat products is well known [ 1 , 2 , 6 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 34 ]. Compared to Lb.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…carnosum, Lc. gelidum and carnobacteria strains to prevail in Northern European meat products and plants [ 5 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 ]. Nevertheless, the product type and the packaging and storage conditions remain the most decisive factors for the ultimate spoilage LAB species selection [ 39 , 40 , 56 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MAP is the replacement of air with another gas mixture before sealing in barrier materials, with CO 2 , N 2 and O 2 gases being the most commonly used. The major cause of spoilage is contamination by microorganisms during processing from animal slaughter to meat products [ 47 , 48 ]. Spoilage depends on the number and type of microorganisms, and microbial proliferation during storage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%