Spoken grammar practice in CALL: The effect of corrective feedback and education level in adult L2 learning

Abstract

Although most second language learning studies involve high-educated participants, addressing low-educated participants seems important as research suggests that education background impacts second language (L2) learning efficiency. A controversial point in the L2 learning literature is the role of corrective feedback (CF). Research on CF in relation to individual differences, including education background, requires controlled experimental environments. This article presents a study in such a controlled environment: a computer assisted language learning (CALL) system with logging capabilities and automatic speech processing to provide CF on spoken grammar practice. In the experiment, 68 Dutch L2 learners were randomly assigned to either an automatic grammaticality CF condition or a NOCF (no corrective feedback) condition. We analysed learning outcome, evaluative measures, and practice behaviour logged by the CALL system. Practice behaviour differed with education background, which in turn related to learning outcome. Learners with high and medium education levels benefitted from speaking practice in both conditions, while low-educated learners did not benefit from practice, in neither condition. For medium and high educated learners there was a trend for CF to increase practice effectiveness. Education level therefore is an important individual difference in L2 learning research that influences the effectiveness of CF.

Using Challenges to Enhance a Learning Game for Pronunciation Training of English as a Second Language

“…Also, even though both competitions were not carried out at the same time, they followed the same day-protocol schedule, and there were differences in the initial success rates of both competitions. However, more research is needed to analyze the impact on learning outcomes of other possible factors, such as students' practice behavior or their educational level [90].…”

Where does a ‘foreign’ accent matter? German, Spanish and Singaporean listeners’ reactions to Dutch-accented English, and standard British and American English accents

“…Traditionally, in second language acquisition (SLA) research the perspective is that fully acquiring an L2 involves achieving proficiency in a 'target language', free from L1 influence [e.g. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7], which most L2 speakers do not achieve [4][5][6]8]. This perspective has been criticized for assuming that L2 speakers are at a linguistic disadvantage because they are less 'competent' than L1 speakers and for not sufficiently taking the social and interactive nature of language use into consideration [e.g.…”

Identifying the contradictions in the technology enhanced language classroom

“…Other areas include CALL and learner autonomy (Bahari, 2019;Blin, 2004;Reinders & Hubbard, 2013;Schwienhorst, 2012), the use of automatic writing evaluation (AWE) (Li et al, 2019) and interactive courseware for writing (Tsai, 2019). Research has also taken place into autonomous learners and corrective spoken grammar feedback (Penning de Vries, Cucchiarini, Strik, & van Hout, 2019), as well as the flipped classroom in different international contexts (Webb & Doman, 2019). However, while the research carried out in this paper concerns face-to-face classrooms, much recent CALL research focusses instead on autonomous and distance learning.…”