1997
DOI: 10.1006/mvre.1997.2047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sponge-Induced Angiogenesis in Mice and the Pharmacological Reactivity of the Neovasculature Quantitated by a Fluorimetric Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
6

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
33
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The sponge implantation model was developed to study angiogenesis in vivo as described previously with some modifications (48). Sponge discs (diameter, 0.7 cm; thickness, 0.2 cm) were prepared from the polyester polyurethane foam.…”
Section: Sponge Implantation Model Of Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sponge implantation model was developed to study angiogenesis in vivo as described previously with some modifications (48). Sponge discs (diameter, 0.7 cm; thickness, 0.2 cm) were prepared from the polyester polyurethane foam.…”
Section: Sponge Implantation Model Of Angiogenesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FGF-2 has long been known to be a potent activator of angiogenesis in several types of angiogenic models in vivo, including chick chorioallantoic membrane assay (Ribatti et al, 1997;Wilting et al, 1991), rabbit, mouse, and rat corneal pocket assay (BenEzra et al, 1993;DeLisser et al, 1997;Kenyon et al, 1996;Seghezzi et al, 1998;Ziche et al, 1997), and sponge or Matrigel subcutaneous implant models in rodents (Andrade et al, 1997;BenEzra et al, 1993;Fan, 1995a, 1995b;Passaniti et al, 1992). VEGF has also been described as an angiogenic factor in vivo (Asahara et al, 1995;Dellian et al, 1996;Wilting et al, 1993), yet its potency does not appear to equate with FGF-2 in many of the assays used.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vários estudos [28,[38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] têm demonstrado a presença da resposta imune tumoral no momento do diagnóstico. Entretanto, ainda não há consenso sobre o real valor do infiltrado leucocitário no microambiente tumoral.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified