Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
processing, and enable numerous inks to be utilized within the same printed construct. However, most soft materials are not widely applicable to such traditional ink-based 3D printing techniques, specifically when necessary physicochemical properties such as certain rheological behavior and crosslinking mechanisms are lacking. Complementary to the ink-based printing approaches described above, the light-based 3D printing modalities, also known as vat polymerization-based 3D printing, are the other technology in place for soft materials in which a photocurable liquid resin stored in a vat (tank) is treated layer-by-layer with either visible or UV light. [7] Typical light-based 3D printing techniques for soft matter include stereolithography, digital light processing, continuous liquid interface production, and two-photon polymerization. [1,7] Despite the superior printing resolution, accuracy, speed, and the freedom to print very complex and delicate parts, the light-based printing techniques suffer from several drawbacks including a limited selection of processable photocurable resins and challenges in realizing multimaterial 3D printing in a single build process. Furthermore, using ink-or light-based printing modalities, it is challenging, if not impossible, to shape soft matters into freeform complex 3D designs, in which the printing can be performed in an omnidirectional manner (not limited to layer-by-layer patterning). Freeform 3D printing removes restrictions on structural complexity, allowing overhanging parts, internal void spaces, and disconnected features to be created. Thus, to overcome the inherent difficulties associated with printing soft matter discussed above and to enable freeform fabrication from an ever-broadening palette of soft materials, liquid-in-liquid 3D printing (LL3DP) approach has emerged as a new class of 3D printing techniques. [8][9][10][11]15,16,22] The LL3DP approaches fall under the category of ink-based 3D printing (Figure 1) since the printing materials (that make up the final part) are printed in the form of an ink as opposed to light-based (vat polymerization-based) 3D printing in which the printing materials are contained in a vat and cured selectively. In LL3DP techniques, while the translation stage moves according to a 3D design, the ink phase is extruded into a meticulously selected second bath phase. [8][9][10][11] The extrusion of the ink within the bath phase prevents the print collapse and ensures the shape fidelity, structural integrity, and necessary feature resolution of the final constructs. [8][9][10][11] By adopting such printing approaches, freeform fabrication Shaping soft materials into prescribed 3D complex designs has been challenging yet feasible using various 3D printing technologies. For a broader range of soft matters to be printable, liquid-in-liquid 3D printing techniques have emerged in which an ink phase is printed into 3D constructs within a bath. Most of the attention in this field has been focused on using a support bath with favorable rheology ...
processing, and enable numerous inks to be utilized within the same printed construct. However, most soft materials are not widely applicable to such traditional ink-based 3D printing techniques, specifically when necessary physicochemical properties such as certain rheological behavior and crosslinking mechanisms are lacking. Complementary to the ink-based printing approaches described above, the light-based 3D printing modalities, also known as vat polymerization-based 3D printing, are the other technology in place for soft materials in which a photocurable liquid resin stored in a vat (tank) is treated layer-by-layer with either visible or UV light. [7] Typical light-based 3D printing techniques for soft matter include stereolithography, digital light processing, continuous liquid interface production, and two-photon polymerization. [1,7] Despite the superior printing resolution, accuracy, speed, and the freedom to print very complex and delicate parts, the light-based printing techniques suffer from several drawbacks including a limited selection of processable photocurable resins and challenges in realizing multimaterial 3D printing in a single build process. Furthermore, using ink-or light-based printing modalities, it is challenging, if not impossible, to shape soft matters into freeform complex 3D designs, in which the printing can be performed in an omnidirectional manner (not limited to layer-by-layer patterning). Freeform 3D printing removes restrictions on structural complexity, allowing overhanging parts, internal void spaces, and disconnected features to be created. Thus, to overcome the inherent difficulties associated with printing soft matter discussed above and to enable freeform fabrication from an ever-broadening palette of soft materials, liquid-in-liquid 3D printing (LL3DP) approach has emerged as a new class of 3D printing techniques. [8][9][10][11]15,16,22] The LL3DP approaches fall under the category of ink-based 3D printing (Figure 1) since the printing materials (that make up the final part) are printed in the form of an ink as opposed to light-based (vat polymerization-based) 3D printing in which the printing materials are contained in a vat and cured selectively. In LL3DP techniques, while the translation stage moves according to a 3D design, the ink phase is extruded into a meticulously selected second bath phase. [8][9][10][11] The extrusion of the ink within the bath phase prevents the print collapse and ensures the shape fidelity, structural integrity, and necessary feature resolution of the final constructs. [8][9][10][11] By adopting such printing approaches, freeform fabrication Shaping soft materials into prescribed 3D complex designs has been challenging yet feasible using various 3D printing technologies. For a broader range of soft matters to be printable, liquid-in-liquid 3D printing techniques have emerged in which an ink phase is printed into 3D constructs within a bath. Most of the attention in this field has been focused on using a support bath with favorable rheology ...
MXene and graphene cryogels have demonstrated excellent electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness due to their exceptional electrical conductivity, low density, and ability to dissipate electromagnetic waves through numerous internal interfaces. However, their synthesis demands costly reduction techniques and/or pre‐processing methods such as freeze‐casting to achieve high EMI shielding and mechanical performance. Furthermore, limited research has been conducted on optimizing the cryogel microstructures and porosity to enhance EMI shielding effectiveness while reducing materials consumption. Herein, a novel approach to produce ultra‐lightweight cryogels composed of Ti3C2Tx/graphene oxide (GO) displaying multiscale porosity is presented to enable high‐performance EMI shielding. This method uses controllable templating through the interfacial assembly of filamentous‐structured liquids that are readily converted into EMI cryogels. The obtained ultra‐flyweight cryogels (3–7 mg cm−3) exhibit outstanding specific EMI shielding effectiveness (33 000–50 000 dB cm2 g−1) while eliminating the need for chemical or thermal reduction. Furthermore, exceptional shielding is achieved when the Ti3C2Tx/GO cryogels are used as the backbone of conductive epoxy nanocomposites, yielding EMI shielding effectiveness of 31.7–51.4 dB at a low filler loading (0.3–0.7 wt%). Overall, a one‐of‐a‐kind EMI shielding system is introduced that is readily processed while affording scalability and performance.
Accurate measurement of complicated multiphase flow is crucial to the safety and efficiency of petroleum and chemical industrial facilities. However, the existing multiphase flow detection techniques are not applicable to pipelines in remote regions including deserts or deep seas, due to the high cost of providing a stable power supply. Herein, a self‐powered multiphase flow sensor, composed of a liquid‐driven triboelectric nanogenerator (TENG) ‐based signal generator, a ring‐type transmitter, and a string‐type receiver, is proposed. Theoretical modeling of displacement current between transmitter and receiver implies that the received current signal can accurately reflect the wetting state of the receiver, validated by a combined experimental (accuracy above 97%) and simulation study. Coupling with a quantitative analysis algorithm, a multiphase flow detection system with numerous receiver measurement points is developed to precisely monitor various flow parameters, including slug frequency (one point), slug length (two points), and flow pattern (four points), which is verified by spontaneous high‐speed camera recordings of water–air flow. The present work provides a paradigm‐shift way to develop a self‐powered, inexpensive, and accurate technique to detect multiphase flow at remote industrial facilities.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.