1991
DOI: 10.1080/00220485.1991.10844697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sponsoring Public Goods: The Case of CAI on the PC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CAI method, traceable to the work of Patrick Suppes and Richard Atkinson at Stanford University in 1963, was developed as computer-based, individualized instructional strategies that allowed learners to correct their responses through rapid feedback; mastery was obtained through drill and practice by allowing the student to take an active role in the learning process (Suppes, 1980). Unfortunately, the CAI revolution has not generated enthusiasm in the teaching of economics (Lovell, 1991;Porter & Riley, 1992). Unfortunately, the CAI revolution has not generated enthusiasm in the teaching of economics (Lovell, 1991;Porter & Riley, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAI method, traceable to the work of Patrick Suppes and Richard Atkinson at Stanford University in 1963, was developed as computer-based, individualized instructional strategies that allowed learners to correct their responses through rapid feedback; mastery was obtained through drill and practice by allowing the student to take an active role in the learning process (Suppes, 1980). Unfortunately, the CAI revolution has not generated enthusiasm in the teaching of economics (Lovell, 1991;Porter & Riley, 1992). Unfortunately, the CAI revolution has not generated enthusiasm in the teaching of economics (Lovell, 1991;Porter & Riley, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lovell (1991) suggests one reason: educational software has some of the characteristics of a public good. I believe that sociological labs are valuable, but this is only part of the truth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%