Spontaneous charitable donations in Sweden before and after COVID: A natural experiment

Abstract

Did the outbreak of COVID‐19 influence spontaneous donation behavior? To investigate this, we conducted a natural experiment on real donation data. We analyzed the absolute amount, and the proportion of total payments, donated by individuals to charitable organizations via Swish—a widely used mobile online payment application through which most Swedes prefer to make their donations to charity—each day of 2019 and 2020. Spontaneous charitable donations were operationalized as Swish‐payments to numbers starting with 90, as this number is a nationally acknowledged quality control label that is provided to all fundraising operations that are monitored by the Swedish Fundraising Control. The results show that the Swish‐donations fluctuated substantially depending on season (less donations in January–February and during the summer months, and more donations in April–May and during the last months of the year) and specific events (peaks in Swish‐donations often coincided with televised charity fundraising galas). Interrupted time‐series analyses revealed that spontaneous donations were overall unaffected by the pandemic outbreak.

Researching the crowd: Implications on philanthropic crowdfunding and donor characteristics during a pandemic

“…Specifically, Terror Management Theory states that people want to regulate their fear of death after being reminded of their own mortality (Greenberg et al, 1986; Pyszczynski et al, 2021). To deal with the fear of their mortality, people seek to strengthen the sense of meaning in life (Syropoulos & Markowitz, 2021), for instance, via donating money to charitable causes and spending more time with loved ones, as many did during the pandemic (Erlandsson et al, 2022).…”

What do you value? Examining gendered responses to appeal letters

“…The US‐based Fundraising Effectiveness Project, which analyzes data from the Growth in Giving database, calls 2020 “a highly anomalous year,” with sector‐wide results that “were not the best indication of what was typical” (Giving Tuesday, 2021). While an early report finds that spontaneous giving in Sweden was unaffected by COVID (Erlandsson et al, 2022), philanthropic patterns vary across country contexts (Sneddon et al, 2020; Wiepking & Handy, 2015). It is too soon to analyze full results from 2021, but it is entirely possible that the dynamics resulting in 2020's volatility have not yet settled, resulting in observed outcomes that may not generalize well to more settled contexts.…”

Special issue Covid‐19 and donation behaviour: Evidence on different types of donation behaviour from different countries

“…The second article (Wade et al, 2022) in the special issue focusses on the concept of embodied philanthropy wherein individuals engage in fundraising activities to support their causes by publicly displaying bodily labour such as Sir Thomas Moore's walk for the NHS in the United Kingdom. The third article (Erlandsson et al, 2022) employs a natural experiment to understand spontaneous donation behaviour during the pandemic in Sweden. Findings suggest that spontaneous donations were rather unaffected by the pandemic outbreak but were influenced by seasons (with more donations in April–May and the end of the year and fewer donations in January–February and during the summer months) and specific events such as televised charity fundraising galas.…”