“…13 Both Shah et al 20 and Bleyen et al 21 suggested that certain genotypes may be necessary for successful repopulation. Shah et al 20 suggest that on the basis of positive immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratins, their case may represent a variant of posterior polymorphous dystrophy rather than Fuchs, calling into question whether this finding translates to the more common endothelial dystrophy. 20,22 We would question this based on the fact that all other data presented in their case including clinical appearance, light microscopy, and confocal microscopy seem consistent with Fuchs dystrophy, and cytokeratin positivity does not preclude the diagnosis of Fuchs, having been previously described in this condition.…”