1953
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1953.sp005011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous fluctuations of excitability in the muscle spindle of the frog

Abstract: The discharge of impulses from the muscle spindle of the frog, when subjected to a constant mechanical stimulus (stretch), may show great irregularity. This is most noticeable when the muscle is near its resting length. The mean rate of impulses is then very low, and successive intervals appear to vary in a random manner. As the muscle is stretched, the rate of afferent discharge increases and irregularities become less obvious (Matthews, 1931).A possible explanation of the random discharge at low frequency ha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
41
1
1

Year Published

1957
1957
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
41
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10C. Irregularity of discharge is a feature of receptors firing at a low frequency (Buller, Nicholls & Str6m, 1953) and it is also known that increasing the frequency regularizes the discharge; but the frequency at which this occurs is very low when compared with the frequency at which dropping out of impulses was observed in the present experiments.…”
Section: Stimulation and Desensitization By Veratrum Alkaloids Pulmonmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…10C. Irregularity of discharge is a feature of receptors firing at a low frequency (Buller, Nicholls & Str6m, 1953) and it is also known that increasing the frequency regularizes the discharge; but the frequency at which this occurs is very low when compared with the frequency at which dropping out of impulses was observed in the present experiments.…”
Section: Stimulation and Desensitization By Veratrum Alkaloids Pulmonmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…It will be noted that these latency distributions bear a close resemblance to the interval distributions studied by Buller et al (1953) and by Hagiwara (1954) for the muscle spindle, by Grossman and Viernstein (1961) for slowly adapting, spontaneously discharging neurons of the cochlear nucleus and by Amassian et al (1961) for the spontaneous activity of neurons in the reticular formation of the midbrain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Furthermore, the idea that very brief fluctuations of membrane potential have probably little effect, is advanced by Buller et al (1953). Until now the lower frequency limit of the noise studied in the model has been kept constant at 20 c/s.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the hypothesis of Buller adequately explains the variability of the impulse train, he did not explore its consequences for the adaptation process, nor does it explain the progressive changes in the distribution of intervals during adaptation ( Fig. 5; Buller et al 1953, fig. 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%