2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous hyperactivity in the auditory midbrain: Relationship to afferent input

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
8
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our previous work showed that the peripheral dependence of central hyperactivity is temporary [18], and that the central-intrinsic phase emerges at around 8 to 12 weeks post–trauma [27]. At this latter stage, both hyperactivity and tinnitus should become resistant to furosemide treatment and further animal studies are needed to test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previous work showed that the peripheral dependence of central hyperactivity is temporary [18], and that the central-intrinsic phase emerges at around 8 to 12 weeks post–trauma [27]. At this latter stage, both hyperactivity and tinnitus should become resistant to furosemide treatment and further animal studies are needed to test this hypothesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This drive comprises the spontaneous firing of surviving primary afferent neurons, which is still present despite the fact that acoustic trauma reduces sensitivity to sound. In the second stage, central neurons become so excitable that they begin to generate their own intrinsic spontaneous firing and hyperactivity therefore becomes relatively independent of peripheral afferent input [27]. If hyperactivity is involved in the development of tinnitus, this suggests there may be a therapeutic window for recent-onset tinnitus in the first stage, using treatments that reduce cochlear afferent firing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies at the next auditory center of the brain stem, the inferior colliculus (IC), have demonstrated increased SFRs just below, within and just above the noise-damaged region of the cochlea, which correlated with presence of tinnitus using GPIAS [48, 49], but in some studies [50, 51] the increased spontaneous activity was not dependent on the presence of tinnitus. Nonetheless, increases in IC spontaneous activity appear to be dependent on that transmitted from the DCN since DCN ablation prior to noise damage prevents IC hyperactivity as well as tinnitus development [52].…”
Section: Neurophysiological Alterations In Animal Models Of Tinnitusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Type V and I units are assumed to receive direct or indirect inputs from the VCN, while type O units receive direct inputs from the DCN (Davis 2002;Ramachandran and May 2002). In the context of existing neurophysiological models, DCN-based hyperactivity is expected to target type O units (Kaltenbach 2006;Robertson et al 2013). Conversely, VCN-based hyperactivity is directed toward type V and I units (Vogler et al 2011).…”
Section: Surgical Preparation and Single-unit Recordingmentioning
confidence: 99%