2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01763-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous migration of retained intracranial missiles: experience with 16 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moores concluded that migration did not usually change initial surgical management and that the fragment size and proximity to critical structures, including CSF outflow obstruction, should be used to determine the need for removal. 12 There are many instances in the literature where a strategy of nonremoval has acceptable outcomes, 7 , 16 , 17 but even though our patient did not have frank CSF obstruction, we felt that the position of the fragment within the lateral ventricle and its rapid migration mandated its removal. Aydoseli et al described a case in which intraventricular bullet migration caused hydrocephalus weeks after initial presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Moores concluded that migration did not usually change initial surgical management and that the fragment size and proximity to critical structures, including CSF outflow obstruction, should be used to determine the need for removal. 12 There are many instances in the literature where a strategy of nonremoval has acceptable outcomes, 7 , 16 , 17 but even though our patient did not have frank CSF obstruction, we felt that the position of the fragment within the lateral ventricle and its rapid migration mandated its removal. Aydoseli et al described a case in which intraventricular bullet migration caused hydrocephalus weeks after initial presentation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…and the initial intracranial location (e.g., the foreign body is not easily displaced when proximity to bone, blood vessels, meninges, etc.) [ 6 , 25 ]. There is still considerable controversy regarding the management of intracranial foreign bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%