2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41393-022-00834-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous Motor Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Issues for Nerve Transfer Surgery Decision Making

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Delaying surgery allows more time for spontaneous neurological recovery, which may still occur one year after injury, although this is more likely in individuals with motor incomplete injuries and likelihood of achieving functional strength in clinically relevant upper limb muscles has been reported to be very low (3% of individuals regained > 3 finger flexion strength between 6-12 months after injury, if initial strength grade was 0-2). 23,24 In the present study, infralesional LMN abnormality was observed in the majority of limbs tested, especially in the functionally critical C8-T1 myotomes, which are responsible for grasp function. This means that individuals who opt to wait for spontaneous recovery may lose their candidacy or have a sub-optimal response to nerve transfer surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…5 Delaying surgery allows more time for spontaneous neurological recovery, which may still occur one year after injury, although this is more likely in individuals with motor incomplete injuries and likelihood of achieving functional strength in clinically relevant upper limb muscles has been reported to be very low (3% of individuals regained > 3 finger flexion strength between 6-12 months after injury, if initial strength grade was 0-2). 23,24 In the present study, infralesional LMN abnormality was observed in the majority of limbs tested, especially in the functionally critical C8-T1 myotomes, which are responsible for grasp function. This means that individuals who opt to wait for spontaneous recovery may lose their candidacy or have a sub-optimal response to nerve transfer surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…5 Delaying surgery allows more time for spontaneous neurological recovery, which may still occur one year after injury, although this is more likely in individuals with motor incomplete injuries and likelihood of achieving functional strength in clinically relevant upper limb muscles has been reported to be very low (3% of individuals regained > 3 nger exion strength between 6-12 months after injury, if initial strength grade was 0-2) . 23,24 In the present study, infralesional LMN abnormality was observed in the majority of limbs tested, especially in the functionally critical C8-T1 myotomes, which are responsible for grasp function. This means that individuals who opt to wait for spontaneous recovery may lose their candidacy or have a sub-optimal response to nerve transfer surgery.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Over half of these are at the cervical level and profoundly affect the individual's upper extremity (UE) movement and function [3] . Restoring UE function is essential to performing basic activities of daily living (ADLs) and can improve independence in this setting [4,5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%