2003
DOI: 10.1055/s-2003-37253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneous Passage of a Dislocated Esophageal Metal Stent: Report of Two Cases

Abstract: Delayed transpyloric impaction is a very rare complication of esophageal metallic stent placement. Authors report different endoscopic removal techniques, but none of these has been validated yet because of their variable success, time-consuming nature, and risk of perforation and hemorrhage. We report that a "wait-and-see" approach is a safe and effective policy in patients with permeable transpyloric impacted esophageal stents.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The displaced stents were extracted under gastroscope guidance. The incidence of stent displacement in our series (3.6%) was in the range as reported previously (0-12.5%) [39][40][41][42] . The incidence of food-bolus obstruction reported in other countries ranged from 7% to 20%…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The displaced stents were extracted under gastroscope guidance. The incidence of stent displacement in our series (3.6%) was in the range as reported previously (0-12.5%) [39][40][41][42] . The incidence of food-bolus obstruction reported in other countries ranged from 7% to 20%…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We would endorse the recommendation made by others that stent retrieval from the stomach is probably only indicated in the minority of patients in whom a migrated stent causes pain or obstruction of the pylorus, or if it hampers successful placement of a second stent. Perforation or obstruction of the digestive tract are uncommon complications of stent migration [11,18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three patients eliminated the stent through the rectum, one underwent surgery for stent impaction in the colon, and in nine patients, the stents remained in the stomach without clinical complications (range, 1.8-6.5 mo). Di Fiore et al [16] described two cases of stent impaction in the duodenum that could not be resolved by endoscopy. The stents were left in place and the patients died of metastatic disease 2 and 10 mo later, respectively.…”
Section: Conservative Approach To Distally Migrated Esophageal Stentsmentioning
confidence: 99%