2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0550-3213(01)00283-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spontaneously generated gauge invariance

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In essence, we try to extend to their supersymmetric analogs the emergent gauge theories with SLIV and the associated emergence of gauge bosons as massless vector Nambu-Goldstone modes studied earlier [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] (see also [24][25][26][27][28]). Generally speaking, it may turn out that SLIV is not the only reason why massless photons could dynamically appear, if spacetime symmetry is further enlarged.…”
Section: Lorentz Violation and Supersymmetry The Present Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In essence, we try to extend to their supersymmetric analogs the emergent gauge theories with SLIV and the associated emergence of gauge bosons as massless vector Nambu-Goldstone modes studied earlier [6][7][8][9][10][11][12] (see also [24][25][26][27][28]). Generally speaking, it may turn out that SLIV is not the only reason why massless photons could dynamically appear, if spacetime symmetry is further enlarged.…”
Section: Lorentz Violation and Supersymmetry The Present Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The complex S field is now taken in a real basis, S 1 = (S + S * )/ √ 2 and S 2 = (S − S * )/i √ 2, so that the "vector" B field has one time and five space components. As a result, one finally comes to the following Hessian 7 × 7 matrix [being in fact the secondorder partial derivatives matrix taken in the extremum point (C 0 , A μ0 , S 0 ) (20)]:…”
Section: Instability Of Superfield Polynomial Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[50]. Another option might be to disregard J M altogether and allow couplings between the matter and bumblebee fields only through gravity.…”
Section: Bumblebee Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Maxwell form of the kinetic part of B µ can be justified by energy considerations [8] without recourse to a gauge invariance principle. The self-interaction in this "bumblebee" model triggers a Lorentz and CPT-violating VEV B µ = β µ .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%