2003
DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.02158-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spore-forming Serratia marcescens subsp. sakuensis subsp. nov., isolated from a domestic wastewater treatment tank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
49
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
49
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Transmission electron microscopy was performed on the isolate, and it had endospores and a Gramnegative type of cell structure. The organism produced prodigiosin, the compound responsible for red pigmentation in many strains of S. marcescens, S. plymuthica, and S. rubidaea, and had the same biochemical pattern as S. marcescens (2). The formation of endospores had never before been reported for members of the Enterobacteriaceae, and confirmation of the existence of the endospores is now in question; a member of the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Enterobacteriaceae for the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes has so far not been able to identify spores in the isolate (185).…”
Section: Taxonomy Of S Marcescensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Transmission electron microscopy was performed on the isolate, and it had endospores and a Gramnegative type of cell structure. The organism produced prodigiosin, the compound responsible for red pigmentation in many strains of S. marcescens, S. plymuthica, and S. rubidaea, and had the same biochemical pattern as S. marcescens (2). The formation of endospores had never before been reported for members of the Enterobacteriaceae, and confirmation of the existence of the endospores is now in question; a member of the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Enterobacteriaceae for the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes has so far not been able to identify spores in the isolate (185).…”
Section: Taxonomy Of S Marcescensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of endospores had never before been reported for members of the Enterobacteriaceae, and confirmation of the existence of the endospores is now in question; a member of the Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Enterobacteriaceae for the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes has so far not been able to identify spores in the isolate (185). Ajithkumar and others, in the paper where they described this endospore-forming isolate of S. marcescens, suggested that the organism may have undergone gene transfer with Bacillus species present in the wastewater in order to acquire the ability to form endospores (2). If gene transfer can occur between S. marcescens and Bacillus species in nature, then perhaps S. marcescens may also readily lose the acquired genes.…”
Section: Taxonomy Of S Marcescensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The antibiotic susceptibility of the isolates WPRA3, SM11-3J and SC-G18 were similar to other non-pathogenic Serratia species such as S. marcescens subsp. sakuensis JCM 11315 [10], but they were more resistant to antibiotics than S. nemathodiphila DZ0503SBS1 [11], although in comparison with pathogenic Serratia species such as S. marcescens strain 08 [12] and S. marcescens [13] they were more susceptible to antibiotics. Table 1 shows the antibiotic susceptibility of isolates WPRA3, SM11-3J and SC-G18 in comparison with other Serratia species.…”
Section: Antibiotic Susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of establishing a robust genomic signature for endosporulation is also well exemplified by the claims, dismissed by some authors (29) but which are recurrent, that endospores can be formed by certain pathogenic Mycobacterium spp., explaining, for example, the long-term persistence of these organisms in infected hosts (30,31), or by Gram-negative organisms, such as Rhodobacter johrii or Serratia marcescens, the latter a close relative of Escherichia coli (32,33).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%