“…Several features, including the presence of specialized sterile fronds, rhizome growth-form, the distance between adjacent phyllopodia, the insertion type of rhizome scales, scale margin morphology, stomata type, venation type, sori arrangement, indumenta shape and epispore ornamentation, were all treated as diagnostic characters for infrageneric classification and species delimitation of Pyrrosia s.l. in previous studies 2 – 4 , 6 , 8 , 20 , 22 – 24 , 31 , 61 , 69 . If we only use morphologic characters to evaluate the infrageneric classification in Pyrrosia s.l., most groups or sections are not monophyletic 4 , 25 .…”