2007
DOI: 10.1086/518269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spore Morphology in Relation to Phylogeny in the Fern Genus Elaphoglossum (Dryopteridaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
11

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
45
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense, perispore ultrastructure and ornamentation are useful to characterize genus or subgeneric groups within the same family, a conclusion made also by Tryon (1986), Korall and Taylor (2006), Moran et al (2007) and Triana-Moreno (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In this sense, perispore ultrastructure and ornamentation are useful to characterize genus or subgeneric groups within the same family, a conclusion made also by Tryon (1986), Korall and Taylor (2006), Moran et al (2007) and Triana-Moreno (2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…2b). All previous studies of the perispore structure of members of Elaphoglossum subsection Muscosa have revealed papillate structures, so that this has been proposed as a synapomorphy of the subsection (Moran et al, 2007) (Fig. 2a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…15 species, is well-defined by the ovatelanceolate, coriaceous, usually apically obtuse, densely scaly blades, and erose blade scales (Mickel & Atehortúa, 1980). Furthermore, all seven species studied have large, papillate, frequently collapsed spores that have been proposed as a synapomorphy of the subsection (Moran et al, 2007). In Bolivia, this subsection is represented by three species, E. atrorubens Mickel, E. blandum Rosenst., and E. engelii (H.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both names were first published by Christ (1899), but their morphological definitions must be modified regarding changes of species belonging to each subsection (Rouhan et al, 2004). Moran, Garrison and Rouhan (2007) indicated that no known macromorphological or anatomical characters distinguish these two clades; however, three perispore characters are synapomorphic for subsect. Pachyglossa: the presence of cristae, spines and perforations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%