2011
DOI: 10.3201/eid1710.110737_article.htm
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sporotrichosis Caused by Sporothrix mexicana, Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, S. brasiliensis was believed to be restricted to Brazil [6,8,9] and S. mexicana to environmental samples from Mexico [6]. Recently, however, S. mexicana was found in a human patient in Portugal [10] and in re-identification of three clinical isolates maintained in fungal collections since 1955 [9]. Taxonomic revision of S. schenckii var.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…On the other hand, S. brasiliensis was believed to be restricted to Brazil [6,8,9] and S. mexicana to environmental samples from Mexico [6]. Recently, however, S. mexicana was found in a human patient in Portugal [10] and in re-identification of three clinical isolates maintained in fungal collections since 1955 [9]. Taxonomic revision of S. schenckii var.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Emerging and re‐emerging fungal pathogens have been continuously detected and described (Dias et al . ; Santos et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, S. brasiliensis type strain CBS 120339 (IPEC16490), S. globosa IPEC27135 (18), S. schenckii IPEC29334 (IOC1226) (19), and S. mexicana (MUM11.02) (3) were used as controls. All 35 strains were previously phenotypically characterized (3,19), and 15 isolates could not be identified (Table 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, S. brasiliensis type strain CBS 120339 (IPEC16490), S. globosa IPEC27135 (18), S. schenckii IPEC29334 (IOC1226) (19), and S. mexicana (MUM11.02) (3) were used as controls. All 35 strains were previously phenotypically characterized (3,19), and 15 isolates could not be identified (Table 1).Genomic DNA was extracted from the mycelial phase (25), and PCR was performed with the primer T3B (5=-AGGTCGCGGGT TCGAATCC-3=) (24). T3B PCR fingerprinting reproducibility was confirmed by repeating the assays at least 3 times under the same conditions at two different laboratories.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%