“Sport is Double-Edged”: A Delphi Study of Spectator Sport and Population Health

Abstract

The periodic examination of research agendas in sport management is necessary for the field’s advancement. In this mixed-method Delphi study, 15 leading sport management scholars forecast how the field can have a more influential voice in understanding the relationship between spectator sport and population health. Panelists agreed on the importance to not oversell or oversimplify the role of spectator sport; to improve interdisciplinary collaboration, theorization, and research design; to recognize opportunities to advance mental and social well-being; to better relate to stakeholders; and to identify distinctive health effects of spectator sport. A lack of consensus existed about the relationship between spectator sport and environmental well-being and prospects for leveraging spectator sport for participant sport. Drawing from these findings, the authors suggest that future research consider moving beyond simply measuring the effects of spectator sport on population health and, instead, assess its health effects relative to multiple forms of leisure and entertainment.

Introduction: State of Literature Special Issue

“…Finally, they ask us to be sure to enter into our research in sport with a critical eye so that we do not only focus on the positive consequences of the phenomena of interest but also ensure that we recognize any negative impacts as well. We realize that many of these recommendations have been offered by others (e.g., Berg et al, 2021;Frisby, 2005), but we believe it is particularly compelling that many of them are mentioned across the different areas of research.…”