2015
DOI: 10.15341/jbe(2155-7950)/10.06.2015/003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sport Results and Footballer’s Performance Rights’ Valuation

Abstract: One of the most important group of assets in the balance sheet of an enterprise is the group of intangible assets. The asset situation of a sport enterprise is particularly complicated as such a company has an unusual type of intangible assets-players' performance rights. There are many problems with the valuation of such assets. This article presents the econometric approach to solving a valuation problem. Much research takes into account the possibilities of using econometric tools for valuation of the econo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Out of our 111 models, the most frequent method was Ordinary Least Squares with 94 specifications, many of which used panel regression with fixed or random effects. Some other methods were used to correct biases or non‐endogeneity issues: ‐Generalized Method of Moments (seven specifications) was used to handle endogeneity between the valuation and appearances of foreign players (Dimitropoulos et al., 2018), ‐95% quantile OLS regression (3), was used to study the higher segment of the transfer market and the superstar effect (Franck & Nüesch, 2012; Herm et al., 2014), ‐Feasible Generalized Least Squares or Generalized Least Squares (3), were used to handle heteroscedasticity (Majewski, 2016, 2021), ‐Tobit models (3), were used to handle selection bias in the transfer fees, that is, only transferred players fees are available while we do not know the dependent variable for players not transferred for a fee (Carmichael et al., 1999; Ruijg & van Ophem, 2015), ‐Two‐stage least squares (1), were used to handle endogeneity issues (Serna Rodríguez et al., 2019). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Out of our 111 models, the most frequent method was Ordinary Least Squares with 94 specifications, many of which used panel regression with fixed or random effects. Some other methods were used to correct biases or non‐endogeneity issues: ‐Generalized Method of Moments (seven specifications) was used to handle endogeneity between the valuation and appearances of foreign players (Dimitropoulos et al., 2018), ‐95% quantile OLS regression (3), was used to study the higher segment of the transfer market and the superstar effect (Franck & Nüesch, 2012; Herm et al., 2014), ‐Feasible Generalized Least Squares or Generalized Least Squares (3), were used to handle heteroscedasticity (Majewski, 2016, 2021), ‐Tobit models (3), were used to handle selection bias in the transfer fees, that is, only transferred players fees are available while we do not know the dependent variable for players not transferred for a fee (Carmichael et al., 1999; Ruijg & van Ophem, 2015), ‐Two‐stage least squares (1), were used to handle endogeneity issues (Serna Rodríguez et al., 2019). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) only used an age variable, but it was stratified thus incomparable. Finally, Majewski (2021) used a parsimonious equation with three variables: assist + goals , team valuation and a binary variable for brand . The last preliminary remark on the analysis of the significance and sign of the 10 variables is that the significance levels detailed by every article can be quite different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The equation 1 describes the panel data model with the footballers' fixed effects, the club's fixed effects and the effects of player-year and club-year interactions, containing the variables of intellectual capital described in the literature as determinants for a player's market value: The variables were chosen based, mostly, on the articles of Butler (2018), Carmichael et al (2000, Kiefer (2012), Lucifora and Simons (2003), Majewski (2015Majewski ( , 2016 and Metelski (2021). As dependent variable, the logarithm for the player's market value per year was used -according to the inflation index IGP-M (FGV).…”
Section: Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nieco inna sytuacja zawodowa dotyczy bramkarzy -zawodników, w przypadku których wartość rynkowa w dużej mierze zależy od ich doświadczenia (na które wpływają wiek i liczba występów w meczach ligowych i pucharowych [Majewski, 2015]). W związku z tym za interesujący przypadek można uznać kształtowanie się wartości karty zawodniczej Wojciecha Szczęsnego, który został zobrazowany przy pomocy funkcji potęgowej w tab.…”
Section: Tab 4 Model Wykładniczy Dla Wartości Rynkowej Karty Robertunclassified