2019
DOI: 10.1123/ssj.2019-0101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sport Sociology, In Question1

Abstract: In this article, which is an expanded and updated adaptation of the 2018 North American Society for the Sociology of Sport Presidential Address, I look at the challenges and opportunities presented to the field by the Sokal 2.0 hoax. Specifically, I look at issues of epistemology and politics as expressed in, and produced through, the field(s) of sport sociology, physical cultural studies, and critical studies in/of sport. I conclude with a discussion regarding how sport sociologists and scholars in related fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the 21 articles, 10 (48%) simply mentioned CRT instead of integrating it within the framing or analysis of the studies. In other words, CRT was only discussed briefly about its relevancy in previous studies (Harrison & Coakley, 2020;Markula, 2019;Norman et al, 2022;Wilson & VanLuijk, 2019), future studies (Comeaux & Martin, 2018;George, 2023;McGuire-Adams et al, 2022), or how critics have attacked CRT and how to protect the school of thought (Kusz & Hodler, 2023;Mower, 2023;Newman, 2019). Similarly, three of the four book reviews only briefly mentioned CRT or an extension of the framework (Hodler, 2018;Olive, 2020;Posbergh, 2021).…”
Section: -2023mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 21 articles, 10 (48%) simply mentioned CRT instead of integrating it within the framing or analysis of the studies. In other words, CRT was only discussed briefly about its relevancy in previous studies (Harrison & Coakley, 2020;Markula, 2019;Norman et al, 2022;Wilson & VanLuijk, 2019), future studies (Comeaux & Martin, 2018;George, 2023;McGuire-Adams et al, 2022), or how critics have attacked CRT and how to protect the school of thought (Kusz & Hodler, 2023;Mower, 2023;Newman, 2019). Similarly, three of the four book reviews only briefly mentioned CRT or an extension of the framework (Hodler, 2018;Olive, 2020;Posbergh, 2021).…”
Section: -2023mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When written and presented in a way that is accessible for all ( 20 , 21 ), sport sociology can and should add nuanced reality that informs sport policy and social practice ( 22 ). This way of studying sport has the potential to transform how people experience sport and how sport experiences people.…”
Section: Intersectionality In Sport Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This way of studying sport has the potential to transform how people experience sport and how sport experiences people. As Newman ( 22 ) argues:…”
Section: Intersectionality In Sport Sociologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The meanings and implications of Kaepernick's protest have not gone unexamined in the sport studies field. In providing valuable insight into long-standing tensions between politics, nationalism, patriotism, citizenship, meanings of race/racism, and sport, scholars have used his protest to discuss the importance of a publicly engaged sport sociology (Newman, 2019;Walton-Fisette, 2018), examine White undergraduate students' perspectives of race and activism in sport (Chaplin & Montez de Oca, 2019), and consider the traditional media's coverage of athlete activism (Boykoff & Carrington, 2019;Montez de Oca & Suh, 2019). By focusing on memes, we seek to add to this growing body of literature on Colin Kaepernick, while also contributing to the rise of scholarship examining how sport plays a role in the creation and dissemination of the politics of the alt-right (Falcous et al, 2019;Kusz, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%