Sposobnost apikalnog brtvljenja novog materijala: analiza filtracijskom tehnikom

Ozbay, Gizem; Kitiki, Burak; Peker, Sertaç; Kargül, Betül

doi:10.15644/asc48/2.132

Cited by 14 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 43 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Achieving a hermetical seal by entirely filling the root canal space decreases the risk that microorganisms left in the canal might come in contact with oral or periapical fluids (16,17). Therefore, investigations on the sealing ability should proceed until the ideal endodontic sealer is found.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers

Altan

Göztaş²,

İnci³

et al. 2019

Eur Oral Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers PurposeThe aim of this study was to compare the short and long term apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers. Materials and methodsFifty-five extracted human anterior single-root teeth were used. The coronal part of each tooth was removed and the root canals were prepared with NiTi rotary instruments. Teeth were divided into 5 study groups; Group I: MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Brazil); Group II: Sealapex (Sybron-Kerr, Romulus, MI, USA) and Group III: AH Plus (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) (n=15) and negative and positive control groups (n=5). The quality of root canal sealing was assessed by a fluid filtration method performed at 24 h and 180-day time intervals. Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U tests were used to compare the groups. ResultsAt 24 h evaluation, MTA Fillapex presented significantly less microleakage than the Sealapex and AH Plus (p<0.05). At long term interval (180-day), Sealapex and AH Plus presented significantly less microleakage than the MTA Fillapex (p<0.05). ConclusionSealapex and AH Plus showed significantly better sealing abilities than MTA Fillapex in the long term.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers

Altan

Göztaş²,

İnci³

et al. 2019

Eur Oral Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, Camilleri et al [10] found significant leakage at the interface of dentine with Biodentine when the material was etched with phosphoric acid and covered with composite resins in open-sandwich restorations, while the tested glass ionomer cements displayed no microleakage when used in similar conditions. As regarding the use as retrograde filling material, one study concluded that Biodentine provided significant better marginal adaptation when comparing to MTA and glass ionomer cement [20], while other studies reported higher microleakage with Biodentine comparing to MTA when analyzing by fluid filtration method [11] and significantly inferior marginal adaptation comparing to MTA and IRM [19].…”

Section: Results Of the Microleakage Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Most of the studies concluded that the marginal integrity was comparable or even better than for glass-ionomer cements and MTA [6][7][8][9]. However, several studies reported significant leakage at the interface of Biodentine with cervical dentine comparing to glass ionomer cements or MTA overlaid with composite resins [10,11]. Another interesting finding was that dry storage of Biodentine resulted in gaps at the dentin-material interface [12], which might suggest that in case of restorative procedures the moisture of the dentin might influence the interface with the material and the quality of the sealing.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Dental Humidity on Marginal Adaptation of Biodentine Restorations

Iovan¹,

Solomon²,

Stoleriu³

et al. 2019

Mat.Plast.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biodentine is a tricalcium silicate cement used as a dentin replacement in restorative dentistry. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of cavity moisture on the immediate sealing and morphology of the interface between Biodentine and the dental tissues. 20 class II cavities were prepared in extracted teeth. 10 cavities were dried using the air spray before restoring with Biodentine and 10 cavities were preserved moist for the restorative procedure. The teeth were subjected to a microleakage test and then the axial sections were observed under optical microscope and scanning electron microscope. In most situations Biodentine provided an immediate good marginal sealing and a tide contact with adjacent tissues in both occlusal and cervical margins which did not seem to be influenced by the moisture of the dental supporting tissues.

show abstract

“…10,11 Microleakage can cause a variety of adverse effects, such as secondary caries, higher sensitivity of the restored tooth and interfacial staining leading to pulp pathology. 12,13 Leakage tests can be subdivided into old and contemporary methods. Old methods were used to test the presence of gaps and the sealing ability of different restorative materials.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Microleakage in Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentine as Orthograde Apical Plugs in Permanent Teeth Simulated With Open Apices: An in-Vitro Evaluation

Thapaliya¹,

Koul²,

Upadhyay³

et al. 2022

JCMC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The divergent apical architecture makes complete debridement and holding of the obturating material within the root canal impossible as no apical barrier exists, which may result in a canal that is susceptible to leakage. The aim of the study was to evaluate the apical microleakage of MTA AngelusR and BiodentineTM when used as orthograde apical plugs. Methods: Sixty extracted sound human anterior teeth simulated with open apices were equally distributed in two groups viz group A [MTA AngelusR (Mfd by Angelus, Brazil)] and group B [BiodentineTM (Mfd by Septodont, France)]. Apical microleakage in both groups was evaluated using dye penetration method. Dye penetration data of two independent groups were summarized as Mean ± SE (standard error of the mean) and compared by independent Student’s t test. A two-tailed (α=2) p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Apical microleakage of MTA AngelusR [Group A] ranged from 1.30 to 3.10 mm with mean (± SE) 2.16 ± 0.10 mm and median 2.05 mm whereas in BiodentineTM [Group B] it ranged from 0.20 to 1.20 mm with mean (± SE) 0.68 ± 0.06 mm and median 0.60 mm. Sealing ability of Group B (BiodentineTM) was significantly better (p<0.001) and 68.5% higher than Group A (MTA AngelusR). Conclusions: Both the materials exhibited microleakage. There was a significant difference ( P˂ 0.001) between the two groups and BiodentineTM showed to have less apical microleakage than MTA AngelusR.

show abstract

Sposobnost apikalnog brtvljenja novog materijala: analiza filtracijskom tehnikom

Cited by 14 publications

References 43 publications

Comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers

Comparative evaluation of apical sealing ability of different root canal sealers

Influence of Dental Humidity on Marginal Adaptation of Biodentine Restorations

Microleakage in Mineral Trioxide Aggregate and Biodentine as Orthograde Apical Plugs in Permanent Teeth Simulated With Open Apices: An in-Vitro Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About