Spousal Effect and Timing of Retirement

Abstract

The retirement decisions of individuals are strongly influenced by spousal retirement, financial incentives and institutional constraints such as access to early retirement benefits. In the European Union (EU), farm retirement is encouraged by early retirement provisions for farmers. As exit from farming determines the characteristics of structural change in agriculture, it is important to find out how spousal retirement and economic incentives affect the timing and type of retirement decisions among elderly farmers. This paper analyses the timing of early retirement decisions of farming couples using duration analysis and different exit channels. The empirical analysis is based on Finnish farm-level panel data for the period 1993-1998. The results suggest that an expected pension particularly advances farm transfers. Farming couples are found to co-ordinate their early retirement decisions. However, farmers are not found to co-ordinate their early retirement according to spousal retirement under other pension schemes. Copyright 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Factors influencing the strategic decision to further develop dairy production — A study of farmers in central Sweden

“…Pietola et al (2003) found that age had a negative impact on farmers' probability to exit through early retirement schemes, implying that the relatively younger farmers find the early retirement schemes more attractive. Similarly, Väre (2007) found the age of the farmer to be one of the most influential factors for early retirement among Finnish farmers and Väre (2006) found that the older the farmer was, the longer he or she would continue farming after initially being eligible to early retirement schemes. Öhlmér et al (1997) found that the presence of other major problems significantly delayed farmers' detection of problems, something they called avoidance.…”

The dynamics of dairy land use change with respect to the milk quota regime

“…Towe et al, 2008;Goncharova et al, 2008;Wynn et al, 2001;and Väre, 2006). However, none of these allow for both multiple episodes, where events are allowed to occur multiple times (e.g.…”

The political economy of state-level adoption of natural resource damage programs

“…1 and 2 where the unit of time is defined to be a year. Such approaches are not uncommon in empirical settings where changes may not have temporally sharp starting points (Väre 2006;Smith 2004). In this setting we can estimate the semi-parametric Cox partial likelihood hazard model.…”