2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-020-09554-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SpPCANet: a simple deep learning-based feature extraction approach for 3D face recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we evaluate our proposed GS-PCANet image classification algorithm with other open-source histopathology image classification methods: SpPCANet method for image classification [46], multiple clustered instance learning (MCIL) for histopathology image classification [50], saliency-based dictionary learning (SDL) [34], analysis-synthesis learning with shared features (ASLF) [35], patch-based convolutional neural network (PCNN) [36], encoded local projections (ELP) for histopathology image classification [20], and weakly supervised deep learning (WSDL) for whole slide tissue classification [40]. We evaluate these seven methods using commonly used detection/classification measures: precision (P), recall (R), detection accuracy, F β -score, Tanimoto coefficient (T), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves along with the area under the curve (AUC).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we evaluate our proposed GS-PCANet image classification algorithm with other open-source histopathology image classification methods: SpPCANet method for image classification [46], multiple clustered instance learning (MCIL) for histopathology image classification [50], saliency-based dictionary learning (SDL) [34], analysis-synthesis learning with shared features (ASLF) [35], patch-based convolutional neural network (PCNN) [36], encoded local projections (ELP) for histopathology image classification [20], and weakly supervised deep learning (WSDL) for whole slide tissue classification [40]. We evaluate these seven methods using commonly used detection/classification measures: precision (P), recall (R), detection accuracy, F β -score, Tanimoto coefficient (T), and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves along with the area under the curve (AUC).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the training data is limited and/or noisy, as is often the case in medical imaging, these methods tend to show a performance degradation [43]. Another class of learning-based approaches involve orthogonal transformation of the data such as principal component analysis (PCA) transform to extract relevant features for image classification [30], [44]- [46]. These learning-based approaches using orthogonal transformation explore the data distribution to preserve global structures in the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unlike Jing Luo et al [9] and others who directly fused two-dimensional face features with depth map, Xu Kangming et al [10] fused depth features extracted based on a convolutional neural network. Koushik Dutta et al [11] proposed a lightweight deep learning network sppcanet for feature extraction and used a linear support vector machine (SVM) to classify the extracted features.…”
Section: Related Work a 3d Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dutta at al. [138] proposed a lightweight sparse principal component analysis network (SpPCANet). It includes three parts: convolutional layer, nonlinear processing layer and feature merging layer.…”
Section: B 3d Face Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%