2000
DOI: 10.13031/2013.2732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray Chamber Evaluation of Air-Assisted Spraying on Potato Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To spray pesticide in a confined area (Panneton et al, 2000) (Planas et al, 2002), a closed chamber with a metal top cover, pneumatic side walls, and a bottom surface consisting of soil or greenhouse bench covering was initially analyzed. Two atomizer nozzles were placed inside this chambers.…”
Section: Defined Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To spray pesticide in a confined area (Panneton et al, 2000) (Planas et al, 2002), a closed chamber with a metal top cover, pneumatic side walls, and a bottom surface consisting of soil or greenhouse bench covering was initially analyzed. Two atomizer nozzles were placed inside this chambers.…”
Section: Defined Volumementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The physical transport of applied agrochemical sprays through the air to any off-target site is considered spray drift. Many factors affect drift including: (1) The effective composition and type of liquid preparations, droplet size and volatility; (2) Spraying equipment, use of technology, and aircraft operating parameters; (3) Meteorological conditions, such as wind speed and direction, temperature and humidity, atmospheric stability and terrain; (4) The operator's sense of responsibility and skill level [11][12][13][14] . To control weeds, pests and diseases, it needs optimal pesticide dose, the most suitable droplet size, and weather conditions, so that the droplets in the target surface can be better coverage, attachment, spread and absorption.…”
Section: Introduction mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, lower spray volumes could be achieved without impairing spray deposition. Indirectly, nontarget contamination and spray drift can be reduced (Grinstein et al 1988;Hislop et al 1993;Knoche 1994;Panneton et al 2000). Droplet deposition on the underside of leaves is higher with the use of air-assisted sprayers compared to hollow-cone hydraulic nozzles (Holownicki et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%