2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2011.03.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray characteristics and spray cooling heat transfer in the non-boiling regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best performance is obtained at 8 mm within the scope of the experiment, and the heat flux is as high as 263 W/cm 2 with temperature difference of 59.3°C. However, compared to spray flow rate 4.2 L/h for conventional spray cooling [32], the flow rate in VSFEC is only one third of that of conventional spray cooling under the same heat flux. It can be explained as follows: the droplet diameter and temperature decrease a lot after droplet flashes evaporation in VFSEC, these droplets impact the heating surface, forming a liquid film.…”
Section: The Effect Of Spray Height On Heat Transfer Performancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…The best performance is obtained at 8 mm within the scope of the experiment, and the heat flux is as high as 263 W/cm 2 with temperature difference of 59.3°C. However, compared to spray flow rate 4.2 L/h for conventional spray cooling [32], the flow rate in VSFEC is only one third of that of conventional spray cooling under the same heat flux. It can be explained as follows: the droplet diameter and temperature decrease a lot after droplet flashes evaporation in VFSEC, these droplets impact the heating surface, forming a liquid film.…”
Section: The Effect Of Spray Height On Heat Transfer Performancementioning
confidence: 90%
“…64 While in other study [10], the height that the heater surface was fully 65 covered was not the best height. In the non-boiling regime investigation 66 by Cheng et al [11], it was found that spray cooling heat transfer could 67 be improved by increasing the fluid flow rate and reducing the spray 68 height. Schwarzkopf et al [12] noted that the cooling performance 69 dropped off once the spray angle exceeded 50°in their study about 70 the effect of spray angle in spray cooling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The vast majority of work on impinging spray heat transfer has examined surface temperatures above the spray liquid saturation temperature [9]. However, spray cooling has been identified as a potential means of dissipating high heat fluxes at surface temperatures below the liquid saturation temperature, for example, in computer electronics [10,11,12], and the heat transfer mechanisms and parameters such as liquid flow rate, nozzle-to-plate spacing and droplet properties have been investigated [13,14,15]. Both experimental and numerical studies have also been performed for the case of an impinging flow of water droplets entrained in steam [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%