2004
DOI: 10.1081/drt-120038732
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray Drying Tower Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[1,2] As follows from the observations made during research carried out earlier at Lodz Technical University, an improper definition of some initial parameters, particularly atomization parameters, e.g., each fraction should be characterized by the distribution of both velocity and spraying angle and not assumed as equal for all fractions, can be also of vital importance. [3] Due to the flexibility and effectiveness, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique has been widely applied in designing and scaling-up of spray-drying process since the 80-ties. Most of CFD models of spray-drying process [1,2] enable correct determination of the continuous-phase parameters (e.g., distributions of drying air temperature and humidity) regardless a number of simplified assumption in initial and boundary conditions but taking into account heat losses to the environment, the effect of atomizing air, and selecting proper model of flow turbulence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1,2] As follows from the observations made during research carried out earlier at Lodz Technical University, an improper definition of some initial parameters, particularly atomization parameters, e.g., each fraction should be characterized by the distribution of both velocity and spraying angle and not assumed as equal for all fractions, can be also of vital importance. [3] Due to the flexibility and effectiveness, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technique has been widely applied in designing and scaling-up of spray-drying process since the 80-ties. Most of CFD models of spray-drying process [1,2] enable correct determination of the continuous-phase parameters (e.g., distributions of drying air temperature and humidity) regardless a number of simplified assumption in initial and boundary conditions but taking into account heat losses to the environment, the effect of atomizing air, and selecting proper model of flow turbulence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Appropriate data to evaluate particles were taken from PDA measurements. [3] In Fig. 1, the triangles represent selected measurements in the pilot-scale spray dryer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is difficult to follow the changes in the drop surface properties during spray drying, we assumed that the flows of air and particles are associated and that evolution of drying air properties is representative of drop drying, especially in a co-current single-step spray dryer. Air properties can be measured inside the chamber to estimate the particle drying rate, the amount of water evaporated and the maximal product temperature at different levels in the chamber [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The temperature of continuous and disperse phase and air humidity in the dryer were tested on-line. Commercial Dantec systems (Particle Dynamics Analyzer (PDA) and Laser Doppler Anemometry (LDA)), were used to determine the distribution of particle diameters and velocities (Zbicinski and Piatkowski 2004). Samples of material were taken to determine changes in moisture content along the drying path (Delag 2002).…”
Section: Experimental Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These systems permit complex studies on momentum, heat and mass transfer during concurrent and counter-current spray drying (Zbicinski and Piatkowski 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%