2005
DOI: 10.1002/pip.655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray-ILGAR indium sulfide buffers for Cu(In,Ga)(S,Se)2 solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 To replace the CdS layer by a nontoxic, more transparent buffer, and the conventionally used chemical bath deposition by a technique allowing inline processing, In 2 S 3 layers have been deposited by physical vapor deposition, 2 sputtering, 3 atomic layer deposition, 4 and spray ion layer gas reaction. 5 The In 2 S 3 /CIGSe interface has been previously investigated by different destructive depth-profiling techniques, 2,6 high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray analysis, 7 and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy ͑XPS͒. 4,8,9 At ͑post-͒deposition annealing temperatures necessary for high device efficiencies ͑200-250°C͒, a pronounced diffusion of Cu and Na from the CIGSe/Mo/glass substrate into the nominal In 2 S 3 buffer layer was found in these studies.…”
Section: ͑͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 To replace the CdS layer by a nontoxic, more transparent buffer, and the conventionally used chemical bath deposition by a technique allowing inline processing, In 2 S 3 layers have been deposited by physical vapor deposition, 2 sputtering, 3 atomic layer deposition, 4 and spray ion layer gas reaction. 5 The In 2 S 3 /CIGSe interface has been previously investigated by different destructive depth-profiling techniques, 2,6 high-resolution transmission electron microscopy and energy dispersive x-ray analysis, 7 and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy ͑XPS͒. 4,8,9 At ͑post-͒deposition annealing temperatures necessary for high device efficiencies ͑200-250°C͒, a pronounced diffusion of Cu and Na from the CIGSe/Mo/glass substrate into the nominal In 2 S 3 buffer layer was found in these studies.…”
Section: ͑͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 S 3 layers deposited by physical vapor deposition 2 ͑PVD͒, sputtering, 3 or atomic layer deposition 4,5 ͑ALD͒ are among the promising alternatives. Recently, nominal In 2 S 3 buffers were also prepared by the spray ion layer gas reaction 6 ͑Spray-ILGAR͒. The resulting CIGSSe-based solar cells yield comparable efficiencies 6 and stabilities 7 as corresponding CBD-CdS buffered references.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, the spray solution used is InCl 3 dissolved in ethanol and the reactive gas is H 2 S. A more detailed description can be found elsewhere. 6,7,14 Because of the cyclical nature of the Spray-ILGAR process, the thickness of the buffer layer can simply be adjusted by varying the number of spray cycles. A set of samples where this number has been varied between 0 ͑bare, uncovered CIGSSe absorber͒, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 was investigated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations