2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spray water cooling heat transfer at high temperatures and liquid mass fluxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
95
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…New design variable Conjugate-gradient coefficient 2 K in water are estimated from the water jet heat transfer coefficient correlations by Wendelstorf et al [22], while the ℎ 5 = 160 W/m 2 K in air is estimated from the combined natural and radiation heat transfer theory [23]. The search trend of the final average temperature for these two initial guess values was close to the objective value step by step and were within the error range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New design variable Conjugate-gradient coefficient 2 K in water are estimated from the water jet heat transfer coefficient correlations by Wendelstorf et al [22], while the ℎ 5 = 160 W/m 2 K in air is estimated from the combined natural and radiation heat transfer theory [23]. The search trend of the final average temperature for these two initial guess values was close to the objective value step by step and were within the error range.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3], nevertheless heat transfer coefficients (HTC) can still differ over spray width, leading to uneven heat removal during casting. [4][5][6][7] Mean heat transfer coefficients based on adjusted water impact densities [8][9][10][11] are commonly used to describe the heat removal in the secondary cooling zone in continuous casting process simulations, aiming on simplicity and calculation speed. More complex approaches separate these mean values into local mean HTC values over spray width [12][13][14] to reach a more detailed look on temperature distribution below the nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The demand on more detailed information on heat removal thus lead to the development of several test assemblies on laboratory scale to measure local heat transfer coefficients. [10,[26][27][28] 2. Experimental equipment A so called nozzle-measuring-stand (NMS) was developed as prototype within the frame of a K1-MET-Phase1 project in cooperation with voestalpine Stahl Donawitz GmbH, at the Chair of Ferrous Metallurgy (CoFM), Montanuniversität Leoben (MUL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The conclusion clarifies that local impingement pressure plays a vital role in both single phase and multi-phase spray cooling. Wendelstorf et al (2008) studied about the transfer of heat during the water spray cooling of clean surface using full cone nozzles (Vd =14 m/s, dd=350 lm) within the parameter range of Vs=3-30 Kg/ (m 2 .s). The temperature was kept between 200-1100 0 C. The stable film boiling regime depicts decreasing HTC with temperature difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%