2013
DOI: 10.1051/kmae/2013043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spread and distribution pattern ofSinanodonta woodianain Lake Balaton

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sinanodonta woodiana is native to two river basins in China, the Yangtze and Amur rivers, where it was primarily located before its expansion to different parts of the world, including Southeast Asia, Europe, North America, and the Caribbean (Kraszewski, ; Watters, ; Zieritz et al, ). This species is spreading quickly throughout European waters and has reached high densities in many rivers and standing water bodies, such as the Cris/Koros River basin in Romania and Hungary (Sarkany‐Kiss, ; Sarkany‐Kiss, Sirbu, & Hulea, ), Lake Balaton in Hungary (Benkő‐Kiss, Ferincz, Kováts, & Paulovits, ), the Danube and Tisza rivers in Hungary (Bódis, Tóth, & Sousa, , ), lowland rivers in Serbia (Paunovic, Csányi, Simic, Stojanovic, & Cakic, ) and the Czech Republic (Douda, Vrtílek, Slavík, & Reichard, ), channels with soft substrate in Italy (Cappelletti, Cianfanelli, Beltrami, & Ciutti, ), inter‐basin waterways in the Iberian peninsula (Pou‐Rovira et al . , ), and warmer water bodies in Poland (Kraszewski & Zdanowski, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sinanodonta woodiana is native to two river basins in China, the Yangtze and Amur rivers, where it was primarily located before its expansion to different parts of the world, including Southeast Asia, Europe, North America, and the Caribbean (Kraszewski, ; Watters, ; Zieritz et al, ). This species is spreading quickly throughout European waters and has reached high densities in many rivers and standing water bodies, such as the Cris/Koros River basin in Romania and Hungary (Sarkany‐Kiss, ; Sarkany‐Kiss, Sirbu, & Hulea, ), Lake Balaton in Hungary (Benkő‐Kiss, Ferincz, Kováts, & Paulovits, ), the Danube and Tisza rivers in Hungary (Bódis, Tóth, & Sousa, , ), lowland rivers in Serbia (Paunovic, Csányi, Simic, Stojanovic, & Cakic, ) and the Czech Republic (Douda, Vrtílek, Slavík, & Reichard, ), channels with soft substrate in Italy (Cappelletti, Cianfanelli, Beltrami, & Ciutti, ), inter‐basin waterways in the Iberian peninsula (Pou‐Rovira et al . , ), and warmer water bodies in Poland (Kraszewski & Zdanowski, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balaton in Hungary (Benkő-Kiss, Ferincz, Kováts, & Paulovits, 2013), the Danube and Tisza rivers in Hungary (Bódis, Tóth, & Sousa, 2014, lowland rivers in Serbia (Paunovic, Csányi, Simic, Stojanovic, & Cakic, 2006) and the Czech Republic (Douda, Vrtílek, Slavík, & Reichard, 2012), channels with soft substrate in Italy (Cappelletti, Cianfanelli, Beltrami, & Ciutti, 2009), inter-basin waterways in the Iberian peninsula (Pou-Rovira et al, 2009), and warmer water bodies in Poland (Kraszewski & Zdanowski, 2007). Reproduction in S. woodiana occurs in autumn and the glochidia are released in summer in European waters (Douda et al, 2012;Sarkany-Kiss et al, 2000) to begin parasitic life on a host for a period that varies according to environmental conditions, mainly water temperature (Afanasjev, Zdanowski, & Kraszewski, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a higher proportion of young individuals in the invasive than in the native species indicates population trajectories towards a gradually increasing dominance of S. woodiana . Faster reproduction and more successful recruitment of S. woodiana is also a probable mechanism of this species replacing native mussels in other invaded areas (Benkő‐Kiss, Ferincz, Kováts, & Paulovits, ; Cappalletti, Cianfanelli, Beltrami, & Ciutti, ). The competitive advantage of S. woodiana over native mussels can be predicted from a number of features in its reproductive biology.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No native Unionids were found in the fishponds studied although in the opinion of the owner of the fish farm in Dębowiec, they had previously occurred in large numbers. Although the negative impact on native mussels, which is especially visible in areas where the density of Chinese mussels is high (Bódis et al, 2014a,b), was described in the Konin lakes in Poland (Kraszewski and Zdanowski, 2007) as well as in other European countries (Cappelletti et al, 2009;Munjiu, 2011;Benko-Kiss et al, 2013;Kamburska et al, 2013) the coexistence of native Unionids with S. woodiana has also been shown in various aquatic environments (Beran, 2008;Lajtner and Crnčan, 2011). The reason for the current lack of native Unionids in the fishponds studied may be associated with their much lower tolerance of environmental conditions (Bielen et al, 2016), a lower growth rate, and their lower reproductive potential (Blazek and Gelnar, 2006;Douda et al, 2012;Reichard et al, 2012).…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Therefore, in the area being colonised it occurs in aquatic environments that are rich in nutrients (Paunović et al, 2006;Beran, 2008;Demayo et al, 2012;Benko-Kiss et al, 2013) and in those that have a low trophic status, e.g. in alpine lakes in Italy (Cappelletti et al, 2009;Ciutti et al, 2011;Kamburska et al, 2013), in Austria (von Taurer, 2009 or in environments with disturbed temperature conditions due to the use of water in power plants .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%