2018
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2018.2797274
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spreading Factor Allocation for Massive Connectivity in LoRa Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
125
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To analyze how an SF allocation scheme influences the network performance, we compare EIB with two additional SF allocation strategies, namely equal-area-based (EAB) [28] and path-loss-based (PLB) [29], [30] schemes. The EAB scheme uses equal-area annuli while PLB defines annuli based on a path loss model and the SF-specific SNR thresholds.…”
Section: Sf Allocation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze how an SF allocation scheme influences the network performance, we compare EIB with two additional SF allocation strategies, namely equal-area-based (EAB) [28] and path-loss-based (PLB) [29], [30] schemes. The EAB scheme uses equal-area annuli while PLB defines annuli based on a path loss model and the SF-specific SNR thresholds.…”
Section: Sf Allocation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 5. The pathloss-based SF allocation assigns the users while respecting Table I in [4], [6]. We can observe that the pathloss-based SF allocation, and the fair SF allocation tend to assign more users to lower SFs, while the other algorithms assign the users to all SFs.…”
Section: Sf Allocation Algorithms: Fairness or Unfairness?mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The received signal at the gateway should exceed its sensitivity. The receiver sensitivity of the gateway depends on SF as shown in Table I in [4], [6]. In the literature, there are different ways to allocate the SFs between the users, as was mentioned in Section I.…”
Section: A Unfair and Fair Sf Allocation Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the context of LoRa networks, a mathematical analysis on the uplink coverage is conducted in [9] via stochastic geometry, which yet considers only the strongest interferer and ignores the time dependence of (partially) overlapping packets. Recent works in [10] and [11] consider channel fading, aggregate interference, and accurate packet overlapping, and yet it is difficult to obtain the exact distribution of packet success probability analytically. In summary, a tractable and accurate analytical model is highly needed for the performance evaluation in LoRa networks, which also facilitates further system optimization with low-complexity and low-overhead design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%