2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10652-014-9346-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spreading of oil on water in the surface-tension regime

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To investigate the film dynamic evolution, the PDMS spreading process on water surface was performed. As shown in Figure 1A, three stages could be observed from the dynamic contact angles of PDMS solution droplets on water surface, which were the gravity‐inertia, gravity‐viscous, and surface tension‐viscous regimes 33 . The third stage was affected by surface tension and solution viscosity of PDMS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To investigate the film dynamic evolution, the PDMS spreading process on water surface was performed. As shown in Figure 1A, three stages could be observed from the dynamic contact angles of PDMS solution droplets on water surface, which were the gravity‐inertia, gravity‐viscous, and surface tension‐viscous regimes 33 . The third stage was affected by surface tension and solution viscosity of PDMS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As shown in Figure 1A, three stages could be observed from the dynamic contact angles of PDMS solution droplets on water surface, which were the gravity-inertia, gravity-viscous, and surface tension-viscous regimes. 33 The third stage was affected by surface tension and solution viscosity of PDMS. From Table 1, it could be found that for the PDMS solution, the surface tension σ A was affected by the viscosity, which could be controlled by the pre-crosslinking time (Figure 1B).…”
Section: Effect Of Pre-crosslinking Of Pdms On Film Dynamic Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few droplet coalescence studies involving the coflow of bulk fluids indicate a longer coalescence time compared to the corresponding stagnant fluids due to a higher lubrication pressure in the film separating the droplet and fluid–fluid interface . The spreading of drops over liquid–liquid/air–liquid interfaces is an outcome of the interplay between gravity, inertia, viscosity, and surface/IFT forces, wherein the spreading length ( l ) scales with time ( t ) as l ∼ t b , and a wide range of exponents ( b ) has been reported in the literature. Although most of such studies are conducted for air–liquid interfaces, only a few experimental investigations deal with spreading of a droplet at a liquid–liquid interface. , In such studies, spreading was studied in stagnant fluids in macroscale setups, which limits its applicability in a microfluidic co-flowing system as a strong confinement effect, fluid inertia, and negligible gravity would greatly alter the phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works indicated that the initial driving force for the wetting and spreading of an oil droplet on the air–water interface was dominated by the gravity force and balanced by the resistance from the viscous force. , With the progression of the spreading, the oil film became more and more thinner. The surface tension gradient replaced gravity gradually as the main spreading driving force, although the spreading resistance was still dominated by the viscous force. , Investigations on the spreading behavior of oil droplets driven by surface tension gradient have been conducted extensively. It was demonstrated that the Marangoni convection induced along the air–water interface had a significant impact on the spreading characteristics of the oil droplet and the stability of the thin oil film. The spreading stability of the oil film on the air–water interface depended closely on its rheological properties (viscosity and elasticity). However, most of the works on the spreading behavior driven by the Marangoni effect focused on the interfacial flow characteristics of the oil film and the formation mechanism of Marangoni convection along the gas–water interface. , Investigations were scarce into the change in the interface viscosity and elasticity that resulted from the chemical reaction-driven Marangoni convection and its effect on the spreading behavior and the stability of the organic oil film.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface tension gradient replaced gravity gradually as the main spreading driving force, although the spreading resistance was still dominated by the viscous force. 14,15 Investigations on the spreading behavior of oil droplets driven by surface tension gradient have been conducted extensively. 16−20 It was demonstrated that the Marangoni convection induced along the air−water interface had a significant impact on the spreading characteristics of the oil droplet and the stability of the thin oil film.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%