2012
DOI: 10.1155/2012/848630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spreading out Muscle Mass within a Hill-Type Model: A Computer Simulation Study

Abstract: It is state of the art that muscle contraction dynamics is adequately described by a hyperbolic relation between muscle force and contraction velocity (Hill relation), thereby neglecting muscle internal mass inertia (first-order dynamics). Accordingly, the vast majority of modelling approaches also neglect muscle internal inertia. Assuming that such first-order contraction dynamics yet interacts with muscle internal mass distribution, this study investigates two questions: (i) what is the time scale on which t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, virtually all Hill-type muscle models, which are ubiquitously used in biomechanics to understand and predict muscle behaviour, ignore the inertial effect of tissue mass. The importance of inertial effects within muscle was recently demonstrated in a second-order dynamic model that distributed the tissue mass in a series of discrete points through the muscle [13]. This mass model showed time-delays in force development that were due to the internal inertial mass, with the effect being more pronounced for larger muscle where the ratio of mass to contractile force was greater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, virtually all Hill-type muscle models, which are ubiquitously used in biomechanics to understand and predict muscle behaviour, ignore the inertial effect of tissue mass. The importance of inertial effects within muscle was recently demonstrated in a second-order dynamic model that distributed the tissue mass in a series of discrete points through the muscle [13]. This mass model showed time-delays in force development that were due to the internal inertial mass, with the effect being more pronounced for larger muscle where the ratio of mass to contractile force was greater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This mass model showed time-delays in force development that were due to the internal inertial mass, with the effect being more pronounced for larger muscle where the ratio of mass to contractile force was greater. This model makes it possible to consider the inertial effects of fibres within whole muscle, even if they are inactive during submaximal contractions; however, this was not studied at the time [13]. Inertial effects may be considerable for muscles that have a large mass, particularly when activations are low and there is little contractile force to move the inertial load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their descent, the use of WM models seems to be currently restricted to estimating the influence of inertia on skeletal loads in impact situations. Beyond this, we are aware of just four studies that have made an attempt to assess the backlash of mass distribution on end‐point muscle contraction, whereas local contraction phenomena within the muscle itself, including wave propagation, have not been addressed at all. All these four studies had however assumed Hill‐type contractile characteristics, which reflect steady‐state properties, while simulating obviously dynamic, nonsteady‐state loading situations of the muscle.…”
Section: Hill‐type Muscle Models: From Pure Phenomenology To a Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these four studies had however assumed Hill‐type contractile characteristics, which reflect steady‐state properties, while simulating obviously dynamic, nonsteady‐state loading situations of the muscle. Assuming that such first‐order contraction dynamics yet interact with muscle internal mass distribution, two questions were addressed by our own study (Figure ): (a) what is the time scale on which the muscle responds to a force step? (b) How does this response scale with muscle design parameters?…”
Section: Hill‐type Muscle Models: From Pure Phenomenology To a Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation