Spreading Pattern and Tissue Response to Hyaluronic Acid Gel Injections in the Subcutis: Ultrasound Videos, Ultrasound Measurements, and Histology

Abstract

Background Despite the popularity of hyaluronic acid (HA) filler treatments, few publications focus on their effects on adipose tissue. Objectives The authors assessed the deposition pattern in the subcutis of injected HA, the tissue response at short and intermediate term, and the effects of remodeling the filler by strong finger pressure immediately after the treatment. Methods Two brands, specifically developed by the industry for deep injection, were compared. The gels were injected subcutaneously in 5 candidates for abdominoplasty or breast reduction, in the area of excision, 6 to 98 days before surgery. Ultrasound measurements and films were compared with postoperative histological findings. Tissue response was scored semi-quantitatively. Results Real-time ultrasound showed a slightly different deposition pattern of the 2 brands. Histologically, both were present in large pools of the same magnitude and looked the same. Linear retrograde injection sometimes resulted in a globular deposit due to elastic recoil of septae. After remodeling and over time, HA deposits became difficult to detect by ultrasound. Firm remodeling of the tissue immediately after injection or time had no significant effect on filler spread or tissue response. Except for 1 zone of granuloma formation, tolerance for both fillers was good. Conclusions HA deposition in adipose tissue occurs in much larger pools than in the dermis. Ultrasound examination is useful during and immediately after the injection but less reliable after filler remodeling or over time. Filler deposition can be less precise, and reshaping by finger pressure can have less effect than expected. Level of Evidence: 4

Stability of Two Cross-Linked Hyaluronic Acid Gels for the Treatment of Temporal Fossa Volume Loss: A Preliminary Study Using MRI and Visual Observations

“…This effect was also sustained throughout the follow-up period. The persistence of the effect of different types of volumiser gels had been previously demonstrated in several other studies [17][18][19][20]. However, an interesting finding in our observations is how fast the volume of the HA gel increased soon after injection.…”

Dynamic ultrasound evaluation of body fillers and biostimulators in the buttocks of fresh‐frozen specimen

“…Although a minimum frequency of 15 MHz is recommended to study the skin, we found other studies about the sonographic appearance of filler/biostimulators using frequencies lower than 15 MHz. 26,18,27,15 Another limitation is that our study focused on the sonographic aspect of fillers and biostimulators in the buttocks of only one cadaver during and immediately after injection.…”

Safety and Efficacy of Using MaiLi® Precise by Mean of Intradermal Injections for Correcting Perioral Fine Lines

“…The long-lasting effects of HA fillers are still a matter of debate, but several studies have highlighted that these HA gels persist for a longer duration than expected [17,18]. Indeed, HA gels were thought to be reabsorbed within a few months, but several studies suggested that they persist for up to 18 to 24 months [19]. Our study did not include an assessment of persistence.…”