1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00147806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spreads admitting net generating regulizations

Abstract: We say a spread S carries a regulization ~, if E is a collection of reguli contained in 8 and if each element of S, except at most two lines, is contained either in exactly one regulus of or in all reguli of E. Replacement of each regulus of P, by its complementary regulus (exceptional lines remain unchanged) yields the complementary congruence S~ of S with respect to Y;. If S~ is a hyperbolic or parabolic or elliptic linear congruence of lines, then Z is called a net generating, in particular, a hyperbolic or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following two theorems are due to Heimbeck in the Laguerre case; see [9]. Riesinger proves the general case with di¤erent techniques and terminology; see [18]. Proof.…”
Section: Flocks Of Miquelian Circle Planes and Translation Planesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The following two theorems are due to Heimbeck in the Laguerre case; see [9]. Riesinger proves the general case with di¤erent techniques and terminology; see [18]. Proof.…”
Section: Flocks Of Miquelian Circle Planes and Translation Planesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…We solve (20) along u 2 and substitute the solution in (22) and get for the unknown s-coordinate of the common points of h(ξ) and h (ξ) the following quadratic equation:…”
Section: Existence Of Rotational Spreads With a System Of Coaxial Acementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See [20,Section 3].) In the present paper we need the concept 'flock' only in the elliptic case and only for real basic field.…”
Section: The Thas-walker Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For spreads with net generating regulizations and references to this subject, see [16], especially Remarks 2.8 and 2.9 are relevant exclusively for elliptic regulizations. For the real projective 3-space PG (3,~) examples of non-regular spreads admitting elliptic regulizations are given in [16,Sections 4.1 and 4.3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7, p.3]. This terminology is not ambiguous because Fix YZ = Aut 5r implies that Z is the only net generating regutization of Y (see [16,Theorem 2.7]). This terminology is not ambiguous because Fix YZ = Aut 5r implies that Z is the only net generating regutization of Y (see [16,Theorem 2.7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%