2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1005/1/012003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spring-back of Thick Uni-Directional Carbon Fibre Reinforced Composite Laminate for Aircraft Structure Application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the part angle or the tool angle was smaller, larger residual stresses were created and the spring-in angle was larger [ 23 ]. Instead of the spring-in angle, Zakaria et al [ 24 ] found that the spring-back value from 1.28° to 2.73° was inversely related to the part angle from 30° to 90° with different thicknesses and specimen sizes. Both papers showed that the angle deviation became larger as the part angle became smaller.…”
Section: Parameter Effects From Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When the part angle or the tool angle was smaller, larger residual stresses were created and the spring-in angle was larger [ 23 ]. Instead of the spring-in angle, Zakaria et al [ 24 ] found that the spring-back value from 1.28° to 2.73° was inversely related to the part angle from 30° to 90° with different thicknesses and specimen sizes. Both papers showed that the angle deviation became larger as the part angle became smaller.…”
Section: Parameter Effects From Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ersoy et al [ 27 ] indicated that as the thickness of C-sections made of unidirectional lay-ups was increased from 1 to 4 mm, the measured spring-in angles were decreased from 1.03° to 0.66°, which were expressed on the base of a 90° angle. In particular, Zakaria et al [ 24 ] indicated that spring-back behavior was found for a 90° curved laminate and decreased with an increment of the part thickness. These studies showed that the angle deviation was reduced with the increase in the part thickness.…”
Section: Parameter Effects From Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The wear of parts in remanufacturing, or non-critical warping of parts in moulded-part manufacturing such as spring-back [2] means that the part does not necessarily match the available CAD model. For legacy parts or the inspection of free-form surfaces autonomously, there may be no CAD model available for path planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%