2016
DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2016.1159205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spring response to precipitation events using δ18O and δ2H in the Tanour catchment, NW Jordan

Abstract: The Tanour spring is one of the several karst springs located in the northern part of Jordan. Water samples from the Tanour spring and precipitation were collected in the area of Ajloun in NW Jordan for the analysis of stable oxygen and hydrogen isotopes to evaluate the spring response to precipitation events. Rainwater and snow samples were collected from different elevations during winters of 2013-2014 and 2014-2015. In addition, spring samples were collected between December 2014 and March 2015. δ(18)O valu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such high values were reported earlier (Gat & Dansgaard, ; IAEA, ; Rindsberger, Magaritz, Carmi, & Gilad, ) and explained by moisture recycling over the Mediterranean Sea (Angert, Lee, & Yakir, ; Gat, ; Gat & Carmi, ; Gat et al, , ; Hamdan, Wiegand, Toll, & Sauter, ; Osati et al, ). High d excess values usually indicate evaporative enrichment especially during warmer periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such high values were reported earlier (Gat & Dansgaard, ; IAEA, ; Rindsberger, Magaritz, Carmi, & Gilad, ) and explained by moisture recycling over the Mediterranean Sea (Angert, Lee, & Yakir, ; Gat, ; Gat & Carmi, ; Gat et al, , ; Hamdan, Wiegand, Toll, & Sauter, ; Osati et al, ). High d excess values usually indicate evaporative enrichment especially during warmer periods.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…to Jeita spring. Groundwater recharge on this plateau, where often more than 4 m of snow accumulates in winter (in winter 2011/2012 snow depth was partly more than 10 m) and which is highly karstified, is believed to reach around 81%, whereas recharge on the Jurassic aquifer is estimated at 58% Such high values were reported earlier (Gat & Dansgaard, 1972;IAEA, 1994;Rindsberger, Magaritz, Carmi, & Gilad, 1983) and explained by moisture recycling over the Mediterranean Sea (Angert, Lee, & Yakir, 2008;Gat, 1996;Gat & Carmi, 1987;Gat et al, 1996Gat et al, , 2003Hamdan, Wiegand, Toll, & Sauter, 2016;Osati et al, 2014). Estimation of mean catchment altitudes for Jeita spring derived from altitude effects in precipitation and snow early winter months in 2012.…”
Section: Local Meteoric Water Linesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Transport times, i.e. residence times through the karst aquifer of the Tanour and Rasoun spring catchments, were determined previously by using the stable isotopes of oxygen and hydrogen (Hamdan et al 2016a). A comparison of the breakthrough signal obtained from the study of the stable isotopes and the transport time vulnerability assessment was made using probability density functions (PDFs).…”
Section: Classical Intrinsic Groundwater Vulnerability Assessment Methods Compared To the Transport Time Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study aims firstly at the development of a spatially distributed transport-timebased vulnerability mapping methodology for karst aquifers based on transport times from each individual location in the catchment through the epikarst towards surface-water streams as final recipients. Secondly, it targets the characterisation of average effective epikarst hydraulic properties using independent data; thirdly, a comparison of the predicted catchment integrated transport-time signal with measured catchment averaged transport times, based on the breakthrough of oxygen and hydrogen stable water isotopes at the Tanour spring after recharge events (Hamdan et al 2016a); and lastly, a comparison between the vulnerability maps based on two classical intrinsic vulnerability methods (COP (Vias et al 2002(Vias et al , 2003(Vias et al , 2006 and EPIK (Doerfliger et al 1999)) and the results of the transport-time-based method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the uneven development of karst as well as the complex and variable movement of groundwater flow, people try to study the migration of pollutants in karst water from different scales using different methods, such as isotopes [5], tracer test [6], pumping test [7], numerical simulation [8][9][10], indoor experiment [11], and so on. For example, Hamdan et al [12] revealed the characteristics of groundwater vulnerability to pollution with the method of combining the stable isotopic (oxygen and hydrogen) and data of water temperature, spring discharge, and turbidity. Morales et al [13] depicted the transport characteristics along preferential flow paths in karst aquifers by analyzing data obtained in 26 tracer tests in Basque.Maloszewski et al [14] combined the application of lumped-parameter models to establish a measurement model for 18 O and tritium in precipitation and springs, and obtained mean values of hydraulic parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%